• Nominated for 10 Best Attorneys for Client Satisfaction in Mississippi for 2019 by American Institute of Criminal Law Attorneys
  • Nominated American Society of Legal Advocates Top 100 Criminal Defense Lawyers in the State of Mississippi for 2019
  • Nominated National Trial Lawyers Top 100 Criminal Defense Lawyers in the State of Mississippi
  • Nominated National Academy of Criminal Defense Attorneys Top 10 Criminal Defense Attorneys in the State of Mississippi for 2018
  • Nominated American Society of Legal Advocates Top 100 Criminal Defense Lawyers in the State of Mississippi for 2018
  • Nominated for 10 Best DUI Attorneys for Client Satisfaction in Mississippi for 2018 by American Institute of DUI/DWI Attorneys
  • Nominated for 10 Best Attorneys for Client Satisfaction in Mississippi for 2018 by American Institute of Criminal Law Attorneys
  • Nominated for 10 Best DUI/DWI Attorneys by American Institute of DUI/DWI Attorneys for 2017 
  • Nominated for 10 Best Criminal Law Attorneys by American Institute of Criminal Law Attorneys for 2017
  • Nominated for 10 Best Attorneys by American Institute of Family Law Attorneys for 2017
  • Nominated for Top 100 Criminal Defense Lawyers by American Society of Legal Advocates for 2017
  • Nominated for Top 100 Criminal Defense Trial Lawyers by the The National Trial Lawyers for 2017
  • Nominated for 10 Best Criminal Law Attorneys by National Institute of Criminal Law Attorneys for 2017
  • Nominated for membership to Top American Lawyers in 2017
  • Nominated for membership of National Association of Personal Injury Lawyers in2017
  • Nominated for 10 Best DUI Attorneys for Client Satisfaction in Mississippi for 2016 by American Institute of DUI/DWI Attorneys
  • Awarded Superb "10" Rating by AVVO
  • Nominated for Top 10 Attorney Award by National Academy of Criminal Defense Attorneys for 2016
  • Top Attorney DUI on AVVO in 2016
  • Top Contributor DUI on AVVO in 2016
  • Nominated for Top 50 DUI Attorneys by National Advocacy for DUI Defense for 2016
  • Nominated for Top 100 Trial Lawyers by The National Trial Lawyers for 2016
  • Nominated for 10 Best Attorneys in Mississippi for Client Satisfaction for 2016 by American Institute of Personal Injury Attorneys
  • Nominated for 10 Best Criminal Law Attorney for Mississippi for 2016 by American Institute of Criminal Law Attorneys
  • Nominatedfor10 Best Family Law Attorneys by American Institute of Family Law Attorneys for 2016
  • Nominated for Top 100 Criminal Defense Lawyers in America by The National Trial Lawyers
  • Nominated for Top 10 Attorney Award for 2015 in Mississippi by National Academy of Criminal Defense Attorneys
  • Nominated for 10 Best Client Satisfaction Award in 2014 by American Institute of DUI/DWI Attorneys
  • Nominated for Top 50 DUI Attorneys for 2014 in Mississippi by the National Advocacy for DUI Defense
  • Nominated for Top 10 Attorney Award for 2014 in Mississippi by National Academy of Criminal Defense Attorneys
  • Top Contributor DUI on AVVO in 2014
  • Top Contributor Criminal Defense on AVVO in 2014
  • Top Attorney DUI on AVVO in 2014
  • Top Attorney Criminal Defense on AVVO in 2014

Related links within this hierarchy

A Practical Guide to Challenging Field Sobriety Tests in Corinth

If you were stopped by law enforcement in Corinth and asked to perform field sobriety tests, you may be facing serious consequences that affect your license, record, and future. This guide walks through common roadside evaluations, why they are frequently unreliable, and how those test results can be contested in Mississippi. Housley Law represents clients in Alcorn County and surrounding areas and focuses on reviewing the traffic stop, officer observations, body and dash camera footage, and medical or environmental issues that could have impacted performance on the tests.

Field sobriety tests are designed to help officers form probable cause, but the conditions under which they occur in Corinth can make them misleading. Factors such as uneven pavement, lighting, weather, fatigue, and medical conditions can reduce a person’s ability to complete tests regardless of alcohol use. Our goal is to identify inconsistencies in the officer’s report, gaps in training or documentation, and physical or environmental causes that explain poor performance, then use that analysis to protect your rights and to seek the best possible outcome for your case.

Why Challenging Field Sobriety Tests Matters for Your Case in Corinth

Challenging the results of field sobriety tests can change the direction of a DUI case. These tests are not definitive measures of impairment and often rely on subjective officer observations. By contesting the reliability and administration of the tests, a defense can reduce the strength of the state’s probable cause, limit admissible evidence, and open opportunities for case dismissal or mitigation. For residents of Corinth, careful review of officer reports, video, and physical evidence helps protect driving privileges and reputation while pursuing the most favorable legal resolution possible under Mississippi law.

Housley Law in Corinth: Our Approach to Field Sobriety Test Challenges

Housley Law handles DUI and criminal defense matters for clients in Corinth and elsewhere in Mississippi, focusing on thorough preparation and aggressive advocacy. Our approach starts with a detailed review of the traffic stop and any available video or witness statements, moving to medical and scientific analysis when appropriate. We work to identify weaknesses in the prosecution’s case, from failure to follow standard procedures to lack of documentation, and then present those findings clearly to judges and prosecutors to seek the best available result for each client.

Understanding Challenges to Field Sobriety Tests in Corinth

Field sobriety tests include common exercises such as the horizontal gaze nystagmus, walk-and-turn, and one-leg stand. These evaluations were created to help officers observe signs of impairment, but they were developed for controlled environments and often fail to account for real-world variables. In Corinth, the road conditions, lighting, and officer training can vary, and many people have medical conditions that mimic signs of impairment. A review that considers these factors is essential to determine whether test results should influence legal proceedings in a DUI matter.

Challenging field sobriety tests involves careful investigation into how and why they were administered. That includes examining officer notes, training records, and any available video footage of the stop. It may also involve consulting medical professionals to document conditions that affect balance or coordination. Understanding the legal standards in Mississippi for probable cause and admissible evidence guides the strategy for suppression motions or negotiations. The objective is to minimize the impact of unreliable tests on the outcome of your case in Alcorn County courts.

What Field Sobriety Tests Are and How Courts View Them

Field sobriety tests are on‑the‑spot assessments officers use to detect signs of impairment through physical tasks and observation. The most recognized are the horizontal gaze nystagmus, walk‑and‑turn, and one‑leg stand. Courts understand these tests can be subjective and are not scientific proof of impairment. Successful challenges often highlight inconsistencies in administration, environmental interference, medical explanations for poor performance, and the officer’s reliance on subjective judgment rather than objective measurement. Demonstrating these issues can limit the tests’ influence at hearings and trials.

Key Elements When Challenging Roadside Sobriety Tests

A strong challenge examines multiple elements: the legality of the traffic stop, whether the officer had reasonable suspicion, how the tests were explained and demonstrated, the testing conditions, documentation and video, and the officer’s training. Each element can undercut the reliability of the test results. For example, failure to properly demonstrate a task, unclear instructions, or an unsafe surface can produce poor performance unrelated to impairment. Gathering this information early preserves defense options for hearings and possible trial in Corinth and elsewhere in Mississippi.

Key Terms and Glossary for Field Sobriety Test Challenges

Understanding a few common terms helps demystify DUI defenses. Terms such as probable cause, standard field sobriety test, HGN (horizontal gaze nystagmus), standardized testing procedures, suppression motion, and calibration relate directly to how courts consider evidence. Familiarity with these words prepares clients to follow case strategy and to ask informed questions. The glossary below gives concise definitions and practical implications for your case in Corinth, helping you better understand the steps your attorney may take in challenging test results or negotiating with prosecutors.

Probable Cause

Probable cause refers to a reasonable belief, based on facts and observations, that a person has committed a crime or is impaired. In DUI cases, officers use observations from driving behavior, smell of alcohol, and field sobriety test performance to establish probable cause for arrest. Challenging probable cause can lead to suppression of statements and test results if the stop or arrest lacked sufficient legal basis. Demonstrating weak or inconsistent facts gathered at the scene is often the first step to limiting the prosecution’s case in court.

Standardized Field Sobriety Tests (SFSTs)

Standardized field sobriety tests are a battery of physical and observational tasks developed to increase consistency when officers assess impairment. The core SFSTs include horizontal gaze nystagmus, walk‑and‑turn, and one‑leg stand. Even so, the accuracy of these tests depends on correct administration, clear instructions, and suitable conditions. In many cases, deviations from the standardized procedures or adverse conditions in Corinth can make the results unreliable and subject to challenge at hearings and trials.

Horizontal Gaze Nystagmus (HGN)

Horizontal gaze nystagmus is an eye movement test in which officers watch for involuntary jerking of the eyes as a subject tracks an object. While certain jerking patterns can correlate with alcohol consumption, other factors like neurological conditions, medications, or fatigue can produce similar eye movements. Challenging HGN typically involves questioning the officer’s technique, the lighting and filming conditions, and whether the subject has medical or medication-related causes for abnormal eye movement that are unrelated to intoxication.

Suppression Motion

A suppression motion seeks to exclude improperly obtained evidence from being used at trial. In field sobriety test challenges, a motion to suppress can target statements, test results, or observations that stem from an illegal stop, an unjustified arrest, or flawed administration of the tests. If the court grants suppression, the prosecution may be forced to proceed without key evidence, which can lead to reduced charges or dismissal. Preparing and arguing suppression motions depends on close review of the incident and supporting documentation.

Comparing Limited Responses and Full Defense Strategies in Corinth

When approaching a DUI arising from field sobriety tests, clients in Corinth can consider limited responses such as negotiating charges or entering a plea based on available evidence, or a full defense strategy that includes motions to suppress and trial preparation. Limited responses may resolve cases more quickly but can leave consequences on a record. A comprehensive defense invests in detailed investigation and legal motions to challenge evidence and seek better outcomes. Choosing the best path depends on the strength of the prosecution’s case and your personal goals for resolution.

When a Limited Approach May Be Appropriate:

Minor Infractions and Weak Penalties

A limited approach may be appropriate when the alleged offense carries minimal penalties or when accepting a plea avoids the uncertainty of trial while still protecting necessary privileges. For drivers in Corinth facing a first offense with limited aggravating factors, negotiating a reduced charge can limit license suspension and fines. This route can provide faster resolution and predictable results, particularly where the available evidence suggests negotiations will achieve acceptable outcomes without the time and expense of extensive litigation in court.

Desire for Swift Resolution

Some clients prefer a limited approach because they value predictability and speed. Resolving matters through negotiation with prosecutors can reduce immediate stress and allow individuals to focus on personal responsibilities such as work and family. In Corinth, this pathway can be attractive when the prosecution’s case is not overwhelmingly strong and the client seeks to minimize the disruption of prolonged court involvement. A careful evaluation of the risks and benefits of a negotiated resolution is essential before accepting any plea.

Why a Thorough Defense Strategy Can Be Important in DUI Cases:

Serious Consequences and Long-Term Impact

DUI convictions can carry long‑term consequences including license suspension, higher insurance rates, employment problems, and a criminal record. For residents of Corinth, protecting driving privileges and future opportunities may justify a comprehensive defense that challenges every weak point in the prosecution’s case. Thorough preparation can uncover evidence problems, show medical causes for test failures, and limit the admissibility of unreliable field tests, all of which can reduce penalties or lead to case dismissal when properly presented to the court.

Complex Evidence and Multiple Legal Issues

A comprehensive defense is often needed when a DUI case involves complex evidence such as dashcam or bodycam footage, chemical test disputes, or allegations of procedural errors. These situations require detailed investigation, consultation with scientific or medical professionals, and careful motion practice. In Corinth and Alcorn County courts, mounting a full defense increases the chance to suppress flawed evidence, impeach unreliable observations, and advocate effectively at hearings and trial to achieve the best possible outcome given the specific facts of the case.

Benefits of Taking a Comprehensive Defense Approach in Corinth

A comprehensive defense preserves all legal options and creates the greatest opportunity to challenge weak or unreliable evidence. By investigating the traffic stop, reviewing video, examining training and maintenance records, and consulting with medical professionals, a defense team can build arguments that directly undermine the prosecution’s case. For people in Corinth, this approach can lead to reduced charges, avoidance of conviction, or better plea agreements when complete exclusion of evidence is not achievable, ultimately helping protect driving privileges and minimize collateral consequences.

Another benefit of a thorough strategy is improved negotiation leverage. When the defense demonstrates an ability to expose weaknesses in the field sobriety testing and related evidence, prosecutors may be more willing to reduce or dismiss charges. Additionally, comprehensive preparation positions the client for success at hearings and trial if negotiations fail. Investing in a full review of the facts can yield legal advantages that smaller-scale responses rarely provide, particularly in jurisdictions like Alcorn County where case details matter.

Stronger Grounds for Suppression Motions

Comprehensive review often reveals procedural or evidentiary flaws that justify filing motions to suppress, excluding unreliable field sobriety test results and other improperly obtained evidence. Suppression can dramatically weaken the prosecution’s case and may lead to dismissal or reduced charges. In Corinth, careful attention to officer statements, video footage, and testing conditions produces clear arguments for the court to evaluate, and those arguments frequently change how prosecutors approach the case during negotiations or at trial.

Preservation of Driving Privileges and Future Opportunities

Protecting a client’s driving record and future prospects is a key benefit of a full defense effort. By seeking suppression, negotiating favorable terms, or obtaining dismissals, the defense minimizes the long‑term impacts on insurance, employment, and licensing. Residents of Corinth who face field sobriety‑related charges often value outcomes that reduce or eliminate convictions, and a comprehensive approach increases the chance of securing those outcomes through careful advocacy in court and discussions with prosecutors.

justice
imgi 1 logo b

Practice Areas

People Also Search For:

Practical Tips for Handling Field Sobriety Tests in Corinth

Stay calm and respectful during the stop

Remaining calm and cooperative during a traffic stop helps avoid escalating the encounter and preserves the best possible record for later review. Speak clearly, follow lawful instructions, and avoid sudden movements. You are not required to volunteer extra information; politely answer basic identification questions but avoid admitting to drinking or impairment. Consistent, measured behavior during the stop reduces conflicts and increases the likelihood that any available video will show clear, non‑confrontational interactions for later assessment in your defense.

Request copies of reports and record the details

After the stop, write down everything you remember: time of day, road conditions, weather, officer statements, and any observable factors that affected your ability to perform tests. Request copies of incident reports, citation paperwork, and any video via public records or through counsel. These contemporaneous notes and records help reconstruct the event accurately during defense preparation and may reveal inconsistencies between the officer’s report and reality, which can be important in motions and negotiations down the line.

Seek prompt legal review

Contact a defense firm as soon as possible to preserve evidence and begin investigation. Early involvement allows for requests for bodycam and dashcam footage before it is overwritten, collection of witness statements, and assessment of medical or environmental factors. A quick review establishes the strongest possible defensive path, whether that is suppression motions, expert consultation, or negotiation. Acting promptly in Corinth helps build a case that addresses test reliability, officer procedure, and any legal issues relevant to a favorable outcome.

Why Consider Legal Help for Field Sobriety Test Challenges in Corinth

You should consider legal assistance if a field sobriety test contributed to a DUI arrest or citation because these tests are inherently subjective and often unreliable. An attorney can evaluate whether your stop and the test administration met legal standards, whether video and reports are consistent, and whether medical or environmental factors explain poor performance. Professional legal review increases the chances to suppress or weaken problematic evidence and can provide realistic guidance on plea options, potential penalties, and steps to protect your driving privileges in Mississippi.

Another reason to seek legal help is the complex interplay between criminal proceedings and administrative actions affecting your driver’s license. Mississippi procedures for license suspension and negotiated resolutions require timely action and knowledge of the local courts. A local attorney familiar with Alcorn County practices can navigate hearings and filings on your behalf, pursuing the best outcome for your case while managing communication with prosecutors and the court to limit collateral consequences.

Common Situations That Lead People in Corinth to Challenge Field Tests

Typical circumstances include uneven or sloped roadside surfaces, poor lighting, inclement weather, physical injuries or medical conditions, medication side effects, and poor instructions or demonstrations by officers. Each of these factors can reduce performance on standardized tasks and create grounds for challenge. Additionally, instances where dashcam or bodycam footage contradicts the officer’s written account, or where officers fail to document key details, often lead drivers to seek legal review and potential suppression of test results in local courts.

Environmental and Road Conditions

Roadside conditions like gravel, potholes, uneven pavement, or a soft shoulder can directly affect balance and gait test performance. Poor lighting at night and bad weather such as rain or wind create further challenges for test takers. When these conditions exist in Corinth during a stop, they can form the basis for arguing that test results reflect the environment rather than impairment. Documenting the scene and obtaining video evidence early can support motions to suppress or to question the reliability of the officer’s observations.

Medical Issues and Physical Limitations

Many medical conditions, past injuries, or prescription medications affect balance, coordination, and vision. Conditions such as inner ear disorders, joint problems, neurological conditions, or even fatigue can lead to poor performance on field tests. When medical issues are present, these factors must be investigated and documented to explain observed behavior and contest conclusions that tests alone indicate impairment. Medical documentation and expert opinions can be important to presenting a complete defense in Alcorn County proceedings.

Officer Procedure and Training Concerns

Problems with how officers explain, demonstrate, or time the tests often undermine results. Deviations from standardized protocols, unclear instructions, or failure to note environmental interferences can all diminish the tests’ reliability. Reviewing training records and bodycam footage can reveal such deviations. When documentation shows a lack of proper procedure, it strengthens arguments that the officer’s observations should not be given significant weight at hearings or trial in Corinth courts.

6

We’re Here to Protect Your Rights in Corinth

Housley Law is available to advise people in Corinth who face DUI-related charges stemming from field sobriety tests. We begin with a free consultation to review the facts, identify immediately available evidence, and explain the steps necessary to protect your driving privileges and legal rights. Our team prioritizes early investigation and clear communication so you understand the potential outcomes and recommended strategy, whether that includes motions, negotiations, or trial preparation in Alcorn County courts.

Why Hire Housley Law for Field Sobriety Test Challenges in Corinth

Housley Law focuses on DUI and criminal defense for clients across Mississippi, including Corinth and Alcorn County. We emphasize prompt investigation, preservation of evidence, and thorough review of all available materials such as officer reports and bodycam footage. Our goal is to identify weaknesses in prosecution evidence, develop appropriate motions, and negotiate aggressively on behalf of clients who wish to avoid the long-term effects of a conviction on licenses, employment, and insurance.

When you contact our firm, we prioritize collecting and preserving critical records before they become unavailable. We coordinate requests for video, subpoena training and maintenance records when needed, and consult medical resources if health conditions are relevant. This methodical preparation helps create strong arguments for suppression or mitigation and gives clients realistic guidance about the likely outcomes and timelines for resolution in local courts.

We also emphasize clear client communication and practical advice at each stage of the case. From the initial consultation through hearings and potential trial, our approach is to explain options plainly and to pursue the strategy most aligned with a client’s priorities. For residents of Corinth and Alcorn County, retaining legal representation early creates the best opportunity to challenge field sobriety test results and to protect long‑term interests.

Contact Housley Law in Corinth to Discuss Your Case

How the Legal Process Works When We Challenge Field Sobriety Tests

Our process begins with an initial consultation to gather the basics of the stop and arrest, followed by immediate preservation requests for video and reports. Next, we conduct an investigative review, looking into officer training, scene conditions, and potential medical explanations for test failure. If necessary, we file pretrial motions to suppress flawed evidence and prepare for hearings or trial. Throughout, we maintain communication with clients about strategy, likely outcomes, and timelines specific to Corinth and Alcorn County court procedures.

Step 1: Case Intake and Evidence Preservation

During intake, we collect your account of the stop, secure necessary documents, and immediately request video and official reports. Preserving dashcam and bodycam footage is a priority because recordings can be overwritten. Timely documentation of the scene, weather, and witnesses is also gathered. This foundation allows for a thorough review of how the stop and tests were conducted and helps determine whether suppression motions or alternative strategies are appropriate in the local court environment.

Collecting Client Statements and Scene Details

We interview clients for a detailed narrative of the stop, noting any physical limitations, medications, or other relevant health issues. We document environmental conditions like lighting and road surface, and we record names and contact details of any witnesses. This contemporaneous information helps reconstruct the event and often reveals facts that undercut the officer’s account, making it a vital part of any challenge to field sobriety test reliability in court proceedings.

Requesting Official Records and Video

We promptly request the police report, CAD logs, and any body or dash camera footage, because such evidence often clarifies or contradicts assertions in the written report. We check for gaps in documentation, time stamps, and possible editing. Early requests maximize the chance of obtaining complete records before they are lost or overwritten, which is essential for preparing suppression motions or building a defense that addresses inconsistencies observed at the scene in Corinth.

Step 2: Investigation and Expert Consultation

After preserving evidence, we investigate training records, calibration logs, and medical histories that may explain test performance. Where appropriate, we consult medical professionals or scientific reviewers to analyze how physical conditions or medications could affect balance, coordination, and eye movement. This coordinated investigation helps establish alternative explanations for poor test results and informs legal motions designed to limit the use of unreliable evidence in court.

Reviewing Officer Training and Procedure

We examine whether officers followed standardized procedures and whether their training records support proper administration of field sobriety tests. Deviations from protocol, lack of documentation, or inconsistencies between officers’ statements and video evidence can all be used to question the reliability of the tests. Demonstrating procedural lapses in how the tests were explained, demonstrated, or timed often strengthens arguments in motions to suppress evidence.

Medical and Scientific Analysis

When medical or physiological factors are relevant, we seek professional review to explain how conditions, medications, or fatigue could produce poor performance on field tests. Scientific analysis can show that observed signs are consistent with non‑alcoholic causes. Presenting that analysis to prosecutors and judges supports motions to exclude unreliable test results and enhances credibility at hearings, making it harder for the prosecution to rely on subjective field evaluations alone.

Step 3: Motions, Negotiation, and Trial Preparation

Based on the investigation, we decide whether to file suppression motions, engage in negotiated resolution efforts, or prepare for trial. Motions to suppress unreliable field sobriety test results and other evidence can narrow the prosecution’s case or lead to dismissal. If negotiations are pursued, we leverage investigative findings to seek reduced charges or better terms. If trial is necessary, we prepare testimony, exhibits, and cross‑examinations to challenge the validity and reliability of the roadside tests.

Filing Pretrial Motions

Pretrial motions focus on excluding evidence that was improperly obtained or is unreliable, such as field sobriety test observations or statements made without proper advisement of rights. These motions require a clear presentation of facts and supporting documentation. Success on a motion can significantly affect the prosecution’s ability to proceed and may change plea negotiations or trial strategy in local court proceedings, creating meaningful opportunities to limit potential penalties.

Negotiation and Trial Advocacy

If suppression is not granted or negotiations are necessary, we use investigative findings to advocate for reduced charges or alternative resolutions that limit the impact on driving privileges and records. When trial is required, we present evidence and witness testimony to challenge the reliability of field sobriety tests and the officer’s observations. Thorough preparation increases the chances of a favorable decision from the court or a stronger position in plea discussions with prosecutors.

Common Questions About Field Sobriety Test Challenges in Corinth

Are field sobriety tests mandatory in Mississippi?

Field sobriety tests are not mandatory in the sense that you cannot be forced to perform them in the same way you are required to comply with a lawful order to pull over. However, refusal to perform may influence an officer’s probable cause determination and could lead to arrest if the officer relies on other observations. Each case differs, and the officer’s reaction to refusal can vary depending on the context of the stop. If you are asked to perform a test, you should remain polite and cautious about volunteering additional information. After the stop, seek legal advice promptly to assess whether the officer had lawful reason to request the tests and whether any evidence obtained should be challenged in court.

Yes. Medical conditions like inner ear problems, neurological disorders, arthritis, or even recent injuries can affect balance and coordination. Prescription medications and fatigue can also produce symptoms that mimic impairment, leading to poor performance on roadside tests. Documenting any relevant medical history can help explain observed behavior during a stop and serves as important evidence in a defense strategy. When medical explanations exist, counsel will typically seek medical records and may consult a healthcare professional to support the defense. This information helps to show that the tests were unreliable indicators of intoxication in your specific situation and can inform motions to suppress or negotiation tactics.

Immediately after an arrest, try to get contact information for any witnesses and preserve as much detail about the stop as you can, including time, weather, and road conditions. Request copies of the citation and report, and note whether the officer mentioned any testing equipment or observations. Avoid making detailed statements without legal counsel, and request to speak with an attorney as soon as possible. Contacting a lawyer early is important to preserve evidence like bodycam and dashcam footage before it is overwritten. An attorney can advise on next steps, file records requests, and begin building a defense that targets weaknesses in the test administration and documentation.

Yes. Bodycam and dashcam footage can be crucial because they provide an objective record of the stop, the way tests were explained and demonstrated, and the surrounding conditions. Video often reveals inconsistencies between written reports and actual events, and can show environmental or procedural problems that undermine the reliability of the tests. Because recordings can be overwritten, it is important to request them quickly. An attorney can help preserve and review the footage to identify issues such as poor lighting, uneven ground, or officer mistakes that support suppression arguments or negotiation leverage.

Improper administration—such as failing to explain or demonstrate a test, using the wrong timing, or conducting tests on unsafe surfaces—can undermine the evidentiary value of field sobriety tests. When those issues are documented, a court may rule the results unreliable, and a motion to suppress could exclude them from the prosecution’s case. Success on a suppression motion depends on demonstrating specific departures from accepted procedures or legal requirements. An attorney’s review of reports, video, and officer training is critical to prepare persuasive arguments that challenge the admissibility of the tests.

You should contact a lawyer as soon as possible after a DUI stop, particularly if field sobriety tests were performed or an arrest was made. Prompt legal involvement allows for early requests to preserve video and documentation before they are changed or lost, and enables immediate investigation into the circumstances of the stop. Early guidance also helps determine whether medical records or witness statements are necessary and provides time to prepare suppression motions or negotiate with prosecutors. Fast action improves the chances of securing favorable outcomes in local proceedings.

Refusing a field sobriety test does not guarantee that you will not be arrested. Officers may rely on other observations such as driving behavior, odor, or admissions to form probable cause. Refusal can sometimes increase an officer’s suspicion, leading to arrest based on alternative grounds. Because each situation is different, it is important to understand the potential consequences of refusal and to consult legal counsel about how best to respond to testing requests. An attorney can evaluate whether refusal negatively impacted the case and how to respond during defense preparation.

Field sobriety tests are observational and rely on an officer’s perception of balance, coordination, and eye movement. Chemical tests, such as breath or blood tests, measure the presence of alcohol or drugs in the body and provide objective data. Courts treat chemical evidence differently from roadside observations, though both can be contested for procedure and reliability issues. A strong defense can challenge both types of evidence: field tests for procedural and subjective problems, and chemical tests for collection, handling, calibration, or chain of custody issues. Each challenge requires different investigative steps and expert review when appropriate.

Yes. Officer training records and certifications related to administering field sobriety tests can typically be requested and may be discoverable in the prosecution’s file. These records can reveal whether the officer received appropriate instruction or if there were documented deviations in training that affect credibility. Reviewing those records helps determine whether the tests were administered in accordance with recognized standards. When gaps or irregularities appear, they can form part of a motion to suppress or a cross-examination strategy at trial.

Environmental factors such as uneven ground, rain, ice, poor lighting, or loud traffic can significantly impair a person’s ability to perform balance and coordination tasks. These conditions make the tests less reliable because they introduce variables unrelated to impairment that affect performance. Documenting the scene and obtaining video of the conditions at the time of the stop helps demonstrate the impact of these environmental factors. Such documentation supports arguments that test results were influenced by the surroundings rather than alcohol or drug impairment.

Related links within this hierarchy

Legal Services

Related links within this hierarchy