Facing an underage DUI charge in Glendale, Mississippi can feel overwhelming for a young driver and their family. Consequences may include license suspension, fines, school discipline, and long-term impacts on insurance and employment opportunities. Housley Law, a criminal defense and DUI law firm serving Forrest County, focuses on careful review of the arrest details, traffic stop law, and the accuracy of testing procedures. Families should document the incident, preserve evidence, and avoid giving detailed statements without legal guidance. Timely action and local court knowledge make a critical difference in preserving options and seeking the best possible outcome.
An early, methodical response after an underage DUI arrest in Glendale helps protect driving privileges and future opportunities. It is important to obtain the citation, police report, and any field testing records quickly so these items can be examined. Housley Law works to identify procedural issues such as improper stops, faulty breath testing, or problems with officer observations that may support defenses. We also help families understand administrative actions like license holds and the timelines to respond. Clear communication about next steps reduces stress for parents and young drivers and helps prepare for hearings in local courts.
Underage DUI matters can carry penalties that extend beyond immediate fines, affecting school records, scholarship eligibility, and future licensure. Effective legal representation focuses on safeguarding driving privileges and reducing or avoiding collateral consequences where possible. By reviewing arrest reports, cross-examining evidence, and negotiating with prosecutors, legal counsel can often secure outcomes that limit long-term harm. In Glendale and the surrounding Forrest County courts, understanding local practices and judges’ tendencies helps shape strategy. Parents and young drivers benefit from a calm, informed approach that prioritizes minimizing disruption to education and future employment while addressing the legal charge directly.
Housley Law is a criminal defense and DUI law firm serving Glendale and Forrest County, Mississippi. Our team focuses on clear communication with families, prompt evidence review, and practical defense strategies in local courts. We emphasize personalized attention to each case, including thorough examination of police procedures, breath and field testing protocols, and any administrative license actions. The goal is to protect driving privileges and reduce collateral impacts for young people. Clients in Glendale can expect straightforward explanations, regular updates on case progress, and advocacy aimed at preserving education, work, and future opportunities.
An underage DUI charge involves specific legal and administrative components that differ from adult DUI matters. In Mississippi, drivers under the legal drinking age face particular scrutiny and may be subject to zero-tolerance laws or enhanced administrative penalties. Defense work requires reviewing the initial traffic stop, any chemical or field testing, and whether proper procedures were followed by law enforcement. Families should understand the distinction between criminal charges and administrative actions affecting licenses, and the timelines for responding to each. Early consultation helps identify defenses and steps to contest testing accuracy or procedural errors in local Glendale proceedings.
Underage DUI defense also includes considering non-criminal consequences such as school disciplinary procedures and insurance impacts. Even if criminal penalties are limited, the administrative suspension of a license can have immediate effects on a young person’s daily life, including transportation to school or work. An effective defense strategy examines all available mitigation measures, from challenging probable cause to negotiating reduced charges or diversion options when available. Families should gather documentation, witness names, and any video or photo evidence to support a fuller picture of events in Glendale and Forrest County hearings.
In Glendale and throughout Mississippi, an underage DUI charge generally refers to operating a motor vehicle while impaired or with a blood alcohol content above a legal threshold for drivers under twenty-one, which may be effectively lower than for adults. Some cases involve alleged impairment from alcohol or other substances, and evidence can include breath or blood tests, officer observations, and field sobriety tests. The legal process may include both criminal court appearances and administrative license hearings. Understanding these distinctions early allows families and young drivers to make informed decisions about hearings, plea options, and potential defenses.
Defending an underage DUI often focuses on multiple elements: whether law enforcement had reasonable suspicion to stop the vehicle, whether probable cause existed for an arrest, and whether testing procedures were reliable. Defense efforts include obtaining police reports, requesting calibration and maintenance records for testing devices, and interviewing witnesses. In addition, counsel may explore diversion programs or negotiate for reduced charges based on mitigating circumstances. In Glendale courts, familiarity with local prosecutors and procedures helps inform these decisions. The ultimate aim is to reduce penalties, protect driving privileges, and minimize long-term negative consequences for the young person involved.
Below are common terms and concepts you may encounter during an underage DUI case in Glendale. Knowing these definitions helps families follow court proceedings, administrative hearings, and defense strategy discussions. Terms cover the nature of chemical tests, what counts as probable cause or reasonable suspicion, and distinctions between criminal charges and administrative license actions. Clear definitions also assist in understanding plea offers or diversion eligibility. If you encounter unfamiliar language in police reports or court documents, bring those materials to your initial consultation so the terminology can be reviewed in the local context of Forrest County courts.
Probable cause refers to the factual basis that leads an officer to believe a person has committed an offense or has violated a traffic law, supporting an arrest or search. In an underage DUI matter, probable cause may arise from observed driving behavior, odor of alcohol, admissions, or signs of impairment during an interaction. Defense review often focuses on whether the officer’s observations were sufficient and whether other explanations exist for the observed conduct. Challenging probable cause can lead to suppression of evidence or dismissal of charges, depending on the circumstances and the court’s findings in Glendale or Forrest County proceedings.
An administrative license action is a separate process from a criminal prosecution that addresses the driver’s privilege to operate a vehicle. After certain arrests, Mississippi authorities may impose a suspension or temporary hold on a license pending administrative review. The timelines and procedures differ from criminal court, and it is important to respond promptly to preserve opportunities to contest the action. Families should be aware that outcomes in administrative hearings can influence practical driving ability even while criminal charges are pending, and timely legal involvement improves the chances of retaining driving privileges or securing alternative transportation solutions.
Field sobriety tests include standardized and non-standardized exercises police use to assess a driver’s coordination and impairment during a traffic stop. Common examples include balance and tracking tasks. These tests are conducted under variable conditions that can affect reliability, such as weather, footwear, or surface conditions. Defense work frequently examines whether tests were administered correctly and whether external factors could explain performance. Challenging the validity or interpretation of field sobriety results can reduce their weight in court and highlight uncertainties in the officer’s assessment of impairment in a Glendale case.
Chemical testing refers to breath, blood, or other laboratory tests used to measure alcohol or substance levels. The accuracy of these tests depends on proper administration, calibration of equipment, chain of custody, and laboratory procedures. Defense efforts often request maintenance records, technician certifications, and test logs to evaluate reliability. In underage DUI matters, low-level readings or disputed test conditions may provide grounds for negotiation or suppression. Reviewing chemical testing details with a legal representative familiar with local practices helps families understand how results may be challenged in Glendale and Forrest County proceedings.
When facing an underage DUI charge, families can consider a narrow approach that focuses on a single issue or a broader strategy that addresses multiple aspects of the case. A limited approach may target one specific procedural error or test result, aiming for a quick resolution on that basis. A comprehensive defense reviews all elements, including traffic stop legality, testing reliability, witness statements, administrative responses, and plea alternatives. Choosing the right path depends on the facts of the case, local court dynamics in Glendale, and the long-term goals for the young person, such as maintaining driving privileges and minimizing educational or insurance impacts.
A limited defense can be effective when there is an obvious procedural flaw in the traffic stop or arrest, such as a lack of reasonable suspicion or clear violations of constitutional protections. If evidence shows the officer lacked a legal basis for the stop, suppression of evidence may resolve the matter without an extensive investigation. This targeted approach can reduce time and cost while focusing on the strongest legal issue. In Glendale, presenting a concise motion based on documented procedural errors can lead to dismissal or reduction if the court finds the stop or arrest improper under local and state law.
When chemical or field test results are demonstrably unreliable due to device problems, improper administration, or contamination, a narrow defense focusing on those issues can be effective. If calibration records or chain-of-custody documentation are missing or inconsistent, the reliability of the test can be successfully questioned. In such cases, resolving the matter by excluding the flawed test evidence may significantly weaken the prosecution’s case. The decision to take a limited approach should consider whether removing that evidence leaves the prosecution unable to meet its burden in Glendale or Forrest County proceedings.
A comprehensive defense is advisable when a case involves several potentially damaging elements, such as mixed witness accounts, questionable testing, administrative license threats, and school or employment implications. Addressing only one issue may leave other vulnerabilities unchallenged and reduce the overall effectiveness of the defense. By evaluating every component of the arrest and arrest-related procedures, counsel can craft a coordinated plan that seeks mitigation, suppression of unreliable evidence, and alternatives to conviction where available. This broader approach also prepares families for possible negotiations and administrative hearings in Glendale and Forrest County.
When long-term consequences such as license restrictions, insurance premiums, academic disciplinary actions, or employment consequences are significant, a comprehensive defense helps protect future opportunities. A holistic strategy looks beyond immediate criminal penalties to reduce collateral harm through negotiation, diversion options, or challenging administrative actions. Working proactively to preserve the young person’s record and driving privileges can prevent ripple effects that last into adulthood. In Glendale, thoughtful planning and broad-based advocacy help families navigate both criminal and administrative systems with the goal of minimizing lasting harm.
A comprehensive approach increases the chances of identifying weaknesses in the prosecution’s case across multiple fronts instead of relying on a single argument. This may include motions to suppress evidence, requests for testing documentation, and negotiation on charges or diversion options. Addressing administrative license matters at the same time can preserve driving privileges while criminal proceedings are ongoing. Families benefit from coordinated advocacy that anticipates potential pitfalls and prepares responses, which often results in more favorable outcomes both in court and in related administrative processes within Glendale and Forrest County systems.
Comprehensive representation also supports clearer communication with parents, schools, and other stakeholders to help manage the non-legal consequences of an underage DUI. With careful planning, it is possible to reduce fines, limit suspension periods, or pursue alternatives that minimize impact on education and work obligations. A broad defense strategy provides flexibility to pursue dismissal, negotiate reduced charges, or seek diversion depending on the unique facts of the case. This holistic focus is aimed at protecting a young person’s immediate needs and long-term prospects in the Glendale community.
One key benefit of a comprehensive defense is proactive protection of driving privileges, which are often central to a young person’s daily life. By addressing both criminal and administrative processes quickly, it is possible to limit suspensions or secure provisional options for transportation. Preserving driving privileges helps maintain access to school, work, and family responsibilities. A coordinated approach also seeks to prevent negative records from affecting future educational or employment opportunities, ensuring that the impact of an underage DUI in Glendale does not unduly restrict the young person’s options going forward.
Comprehensive defense efforts often focus on minimizing collateral consequences such as school disciplinary action, scholarship loss, and increases in insurance premiums. By engaging with schools and negotiating resolutions that address behavioral or educational concerns, families can often mitigate academic consequences. Similarly, addressing the legal matter promptly and seeking reduced outcomes can limit the effect on future insurance costs. A coordinated plan helps ensure that legal results do not automatically translate into disproportionate non-legal harm to a young person’s academic record or financial future in Glendale and surrounding areas.
After an underage DUI arrest in Glendale, preserving all available evidence helps build a strong defense. Keep the citation, take screenshots of any relevant apps or messages, and note the names and contact details of witnesses or passengers. If there is video from dashcams, doorbell cameras, or nearby businesses, make copies before they are overwritten. Document weather and road conditions, footwear, and any other factors that might affect field testing. Detailed records and early collection of materials allow legal representatives to analyze the incident thoroughly and identify factual or procedural issues that can be raised in court or in administrative hearings.
Administrative license actions often have strict deadlines for responses that differ from criminal court schedules. Families should act quickly upon receiving administrative notices and seek legal assistance to prepare timely appeals or requests for hearings. Missing deadlines can result in automatic suspensions or loss of rights to contest the action. An early review of the administrative paperwork allows counsel to prepare arguments about testing reliability, procedural compliance, or alternative transportation arrangements while criminal matters are pending. Prompt attention safeguards practical driving needs and increases the likelihood of preserving privileges during the legal process.
Seeking qualified legal guidance after an underage DUI arrest in Glendale helps families navigate both criminal charges and separate administrative procedures that can affect driving privileges. A local law firm familiar with Forrest County courts can file timely motions, request necessary testing records, and represent a young person at hearings. Legal involvement can reduce the likelihood of default outcomes and help identify diversion or mitigation options, such as community service or education programs. The goal is to minimize penalties and protect future opportunities for education and employment while ensuring the matter is resolved in the most favorable manner possible.
Families often find it difficult to manage the legal process while also supporting a young person emotionally and logistically. A legal team can take on procedural tasks, communicate with prosecutors, and work to limit collateral consequences such as school discipline or insurance impacts. Legal counsel can also advise on interactions with school administrators and help coordinate documentation for any alternative programs that may be available. This support reduces stress and provides a clearer path forward during what can be an uncertain time for both the young driver and their family.
Typical scenarios prompting legal help include traffic stops after late-night driving, collisions involving a young driver, encounters during parties where alcohol was present, and instances where field sobriety tests produced questionable results. School disciplinary involvement or referral to juvenile systems may occur alongside criminal charges, making coordinated defense important. In some cases, a low chemical reading or inconsistent witness statements create opportunities for challenging evidence. Families should seek assistance whenever an underage driver faces potential license suspension, criminal charges, or administrative hearings in Glendale or Forrest County.
Many underage DUI arrests follow traffic stops after gatherings where alcohol was present. In these situations, officers may rely on witness accounts, odors, or observed driving behavior to form probable cause. Defense review looks at the reason for the stop, conditions at the scene, and whether testing was conducted appropriately. Gathering witness contact information and any venue policies or camera footage can help reconstruct events. Families should preserve records of the event and avoid speculative online posts while legal counsel assesses the strengths and weaknesses of the prosecution’s case in Glendale.
When a collision involves a young driver, officers often evaluate drivers for impairment, which can lead to underage DUI charges. In such cases, defense efforts examine accident reports, witness statements, and scene conditions to determine whether impairment can be reliably established. Evidence about posture, injuries, or medical conditions can affect testing outcomes and interpretations. Coordinated investigation of the collision scene and any available recordings helps challenge or contextualize officer observations, with the intent of reducing charges or proving alternative explanations for conduct observed at the scene in Glendale or surrounding areas.
Administrative license problems often arise after an arrest, creating immediate practical concerns for a young driver’s mobility. These matters operate on separate timelines and can result in temporary suspension unless contested promptly. Defense strategy includes requesting hearings, preparing evidence about testing reliability, and presenting mitigating factors that support retention of driving privileges. Working on both criminal charges and administrative responses simultaneously allows for a more complete defense and reduces the chance that a young person will face prolonged transportation difficulties while the criminal case is resolved in Glendale or Forrest County.
Choosing local counsel helps ensure that hearings and filings comply with Forrest County procedures and timelines. Housley Law focuses on practical defense strategies tailored to Glendale cases, including early evidence preservation and administrative response. We communicate regularly with families so they understand the process and the likely outcomes at each stage. This attention to procedural detail and local practice supports informed decisions about motions, hearings, and potential negotiations with prosecutors in the area.
Our team works to balance legal advocacy with minimizing disruption to education and daily life. That can include seeking diversion alternatives, negotiating plea terms that reduce long-term impact, or challenging unreliable evidence. Families benefit from clear explanations of the legal process and the practical options available for addressing both criminal charges and administrative license concerns. Timely action and a comprehensive review of the arrest record and testing documentation are central to preserving future opportunities for young clients.
We also assist families in preparing for hearings and coordinating with schools or employers when necessary, providing a consistent strategy across legal and non-legal arenas. Our goal is to achieve the most favorable outcome possible under the circumstances while protecting a young person’s future. If you need guidance after an underage DUI arrest in Glendale, contact Housley Law for a discussion about immediate steps and potential defenses specific to your situation.
When you retain Housley Law for an underage DUI matter in Glendale, the process begins with a thorough review of arrest documents, testing records, and any available evidence such as video or witness statements. We then assess procedural and evidentiary issues, prepare any necessary motions, and respond to administrative license notices. Communication with the family is continuous so you understand timelines and options. If the case proceeds to court, we represent the young person at hearings, negotiate with prosecutors when appropriate, and advocate for outcomes that limit long-term impact on education and driving privileges.
The first step involves collecting and reviewing the police report, traffic citation, breath or blood test results, and any available video or witness information. We request calibration and maintenance records for testing devices and examine the timeline of events surrounding the stop and arrest. Identifying missing or inconsistent information early allows us to develop targeted motions or negotiation strategies. This groundwork is essential to determine whether a narrow challenge or broader defense is most appropriate for the circumstances in Glendale and Forrest County.
We request all relevant records from law enforcement and testing facilities, including maintenance logs and technician notes. These documents help evaluate the reliability of chemical testing and the procedural steps taken during the stop and arrest. Reviewing these records often uncovers inconsistencies or gaps that can be raised in court or during administrative hearings. Prompt collection is important because some records may be harder to obtain over time. Early access to records supports well-prepared motions and preserves opportunities to challenge evidence in Glendale proceedings.
We identify and reach out to potential witnesses, including passengers, bystanders, or video sources, to preserve statements and materials that may be important to the defense. Family-provided materials like phone records, photos, or videos are also reviewed for relevance. Preserving this evidence early prevents loss or degradation and strengthens the factual record. These efforts support a full understanding of events and can provide context that challenges prosecution accounts during hearings in Glendale or Forrest County courts.
After gathering records, we determine whether to file motions to suppress evidence, motions related to procedural issues, or administrative appeals to contest license actions. These filings are tailored to facts such as lack of reasonable suspicion, errors in testing, or chain-of-custody problems. Administrative responses may request hearings to contest suspensions and to present mitigating evidence to preserve driving privileges. The timing and content of filings are critical, and we prioritize meeting deadlines and presenting clear legal arguments to local courts and administrative bodies in Glendale.
When grounds exist, we prepare and file motions that challenge the legality of the stop or the reliability of test results. Preparing these motions requires a clear factual record and supporting documents obtained during the initial review. Properly drafted motions can lead to suppression of key evidence, which may result in dismissals or favorable plea negotiations. We also prepare witness examinations and develop themes for hearings to present a cohesive defense strategy in local court settings.
Administrative license proceedings often require separate pleadings and attendance at hearings. We assist with preparing evidence and arguments to contest suspensions, present mitigating circumstances, and request alternative arrangements to preserve driving privileges. Timely responses and clear presentation of testing concerns or procedural deficiencies increase the likelihood of retaining limited driving privileges or reducing suspension periods. Coordinating these administrative steps with the criminal defense elements creates a unified approach to protect practical driving needs during the legal process.
Resolution may involve trial, negotiated pleas, diversion programs, or dismissal depending on the facts and the strength of the defense. After resolution, we guide families through any remaining administrative follow-up, record sealing or expungement options where available, and steps to mitigate collateral impacts on school or insurance. Post-resolution planning is important to restore normal activities and reduce the long-term effects of an underage DUI on academic and professional opportunities in Glendale and surrounding areas.
When appropriate, negotiating reduced charges or diversionary measures can limit penalties and avoid more severe long-term consequences. Alternatives such as education programs, community service, or restricted licenses may allow young drivers to continue daily activities while satisfying legal requirements. These negotiated outcomes can be preferable to contested trials when they align with a family’s goals and the circumstances of the case. Effective negotiation relies on a comprehensive understanding of the case record and local prosecutorial practices in Glendale.
After a case concludes, we counsel families about steps to limit lasting effects, such as pursuing record sealing, understanding insurance implications, and documenting compliance with any court-ordered programs. Preparing for these next steps early can ease transitions back to school or work and reduce anxiety about future consequences. We also assist in compiling documentation to show completion of requirements or rehabilitation programs when that supports requests for relief or reduced long-term impacts in local administrative contexts.
After an underage DUI arrest in Glendale, the immediate steps are to preserve documentation, obtain the citation and police report, and avoid giving detailed statements until you have legal guidance. Collect witness names, record any available video evidence, and note details such as time, weather, and footwear that could affect field tests. Timely action to request records and calendar administrative deadlines helps protect legal options and driving privileges while the matter proceeds. Contacting a law firm experienced with Forrest County procedures helps families understand criminal and administrative timelines and prepare necessary responses. Early consultation enables a focused review of testing records, officer reports, and potential defenses. Acting promptly can preserve opportunities to challenge evidence, request hearings, or negotiate outcomes that limit long-term consequences for education, employment, and insurance.
An underage DUI does not always result in an automatic long-term suspension, but administrative actions can impose temporary restrictions on driving privileges if certain conditions are met. Mississippi’s procedures include distinct administrative deadlines and hearings that address licenses separately from criminal charges. It is essential to respond to any administrative notices quickly to preserve the right to contest a suspension. Legal representation helps ensure timely filing of appeals or requests for administrative hearings and prepares arguments about testing reliability or procedural compliance. Contesting an administrative action can result in retaining limited driving privileges or obtaining a reduction in suspension length while the criminal case proceeds, preserving transportation needs for school or work in Glendale.
Yes, chemical and field test results can be challenged based on procedural errors, device maintenance issues, or chain-of-custody gaps. Defense review often requests calibration and maintenance logs, technician notes, and any records showing how tests were administered. In some situations, missing documentation or inconsistent procedures can reduce the evidentiary weight of test results during hearings or trial. Challenging tests requires a detailed factual record and an understanding of testing standards. A focused review of laboratory and device records can uncover grounds to exclude or weaken test evidence, which may lead to reduced charges or dismissal depending on the overall strength of the remaining case against the young driver in Glendale or Forrest County.
Common defenses in underage DUI cases include challenging the legality of the traffic stop, disputing probable cause for arrest, and questioning the reliability of field sobriety or chemical tests. External factors such as lighting, footwear, or medical conditions can affect test outcomes and provide alternative explanations for officer observations. Each defense hinges on the specific facts and documentation of the incident. Effective defense also considers administrative avenues to protect driving privileges and may pursue diversion or mitigation to reduce long-term impacts. Combining procedural challenges with mitigation strategies often yields better overall results than focusing on a single argument, especially in local Glendale proceedings where familiarity with court practices matters.
A conviction or disciplinary action related to an underage DUI can affect school standing, scholarship eligibility, and participation in extracurricular activities depending on school policies. Even absent a criminal conviction, administrative actions that limit driving or involve school involvement may prompt disciplinary review. Families should review institutional policies and communicate proactively with school administrators about the steps being taken to resolve the legal matter. Legal counsel can assist in presenting evidence of remediation, such as completion of education programs or community service, to school officials or during disciplinary proceedings. Demonstrating responsible steps taken after an incident may help reduce educational consequences and preserve scholarship or enrollment opportunities in the longer term.
Some jurisdictions and cases allow for diversion programs or alternative resolutions that avoid formal convictions when certain conditions are met, such as completion of education programs, community service, or probationary terms. Accepting a diversion or alternative may reduce long-term impacts, but eligibility depends on case facts and prosecutor discretion in Glendale or Forrest County. Discussing these options early helps determine whether diversion is realistic for a particular situation. Evaluating diversion requires assessing the strength of the prosecution’s evidence and whether alternative programs align with the family’s goals. Legal counsel can negotiate with prosecutors to seek diversion or reduced charges when appropriate, while ensuring that any agreed terms are clearly defined and feasible for the young person to complete successfully.
The administrative license process timeline varies, but there are often strict deadlines for requesting a hearing or submitting appeals. Prompt attention is necessary because missing a deadline can result in an automatic suspension or loss of rights to contest the action. The scheduling of hearings depends on administrative availability and the complexity of the contested issues. Legal assistance ensures that responses and hearing requests are filed on time and that supporting evidence is prepared. Being proactive in the administrative process increases the chance of preserving limited driving options or obtaining a favorable outcome, reducing disruption to the young person’s school or work obligations in Glendale.
Parents often play an important role in supporting a young person through court and administrative proceedings, and attending hearings can be helpful for emotional support and logistical coordination. In certain circumstances, parental presence also helps present mitigating information about the young driver’s character and responsibilities. However, it is important to coordinate with counsel about what to say during official proceedings to avoid unintended admissions. Consulting with a legal representative before attending hearings ensures that parents understand the process and appropriate interactions with court staff, prosecutors, and school officials. Clear guidance on communication preserves rights and helps present a unified approach to resolving the case and related administrative matters in Glendale.
If cost is a concern, families should inquire about payment options, limited-scope representation, or potential public defense availability depending on the case. Public defender eligibility is often tied to financial need and the nature of the charges. Discussing affordability with a local law firm may uncover flexible arrangements or referrals to appropriate resources to ensure timely legal representation. Regardless of resource limitations, acting quickly to address deadlines and preserve evidence is critical. Early contact with available legal resources helps prevent default outcomes and increases the potential for negotiated resolutions or diversionary options that minimize long-term consequences for the young person.
Restoring a suspended license after resolution typically involves complying with court-ordered conditions, completing any required programs, and following administrative procedures for reinstatement. This may include paying fees, providing proof of insurance, or filing petitions to restore privileges. Understanding the specific requirements and timelines for reinstatement in Mississippi is important to avoid delays. Legal counsel can assist in preparing the necessary documentation, confirming completion of obligations, and advising on steps to expedite restoration. Timely action and accurate record keeping help ensure a smoother return to driving privileges and reduce ongoing disruption to education or employment activities in Glendale.
"*" indicates required fields