Self-defense claims in Mississippi hinge on whether the defendant reasonably believed that force was necessary to prevent imminent harm and whether the response was proportionate. Courts examine the totality of circumstances, including the perceived threat, the defendant’s options for retreat, and available corroborating evidence. Demonstrating self-defense requires careful factual development such as witness testimony, physical evidence, and timeline reconstruction. In Petal, presenting a credible narrative and corroboration is key to persuading prosecutors and juries that defensive force was justified under the circumstances. Counsel evaluates available evidence and gathers supportive documentation to strengthen self-defense claims, including witness statements and medical or scene evidence consistent with defensive action. Challenges include confronting contradictory witness accounts and addressing issues raised by forensic findings. A thorough investigation and clear presentation of the defensive narrative are essential for persuading decision makers of the reasonableness of the defendant’s response.