If you were stopped for DUI in Pass Christian and asked to perform field sobriety tests, you may be facing serious consequences that affect your driving privileges, employment, and reputation. In many cases, results from roadside tests can be misleading due to factors unrelated to alcohol or drugs, such as medical conditions, nervousness, uneven pavement, or improper administration by the officer. This guide explains how field sobriety tests are evaluated, common defense strategies for challenging results, and what to expect when working with a Pass Christian criminal defense and DUI law firm to protect your rights and outcomes in court and at administrative hearings.
Field sobriety tests are only one piece of evidence officers use in DUI investigations across Harrison County and the Pass Christian area. Many clients who believed a test showed impairment later learned that procedural mistakes, poor lighting, or subjective scoring can produce unreliable results. This introduction outlines the main issues to consider, including the differences between standardized tests and informal observation, the role of video evidence, and why early legal review matters in preserving defenses, challenging test validity, and protecting drivers against suspension or charges that could affect their future in Mississippi.
Challenging field sobriety tests can prevent inaccurate roadside assessments from becoming the foundation of a DUI prosecution or an administrative license suspension. Successful challenges can lead to reduced charges, dismissed evidence, or improved outcomes at hearings in Harrison County. For residents of Pass Christian, dismantling flawed test results may limit penalties, avoid ignition interlock requirements, and reduce the long-term impact on insurance and employment. Early intervention can preserve critical evidence, secure witness statements, and identify procedural violations that undermine the validity of officers’ conclusions, offering real benefits to those facing DUI-related legal problems.
Housley Law is a criminal defense and DUI law firm serving Pass Christian and the surrounding parts of Harrison County. Our attorneys focus on analyzing every aspect of a traffic stop and DUI investigation to identify weaknesses in field sobriety testing, breath or blood testing procedures, and officer conduct. We work to reconstruct events, request body and dash cam footage, and consult with outside evaluators when appropriate. Our goal is to provide thorough representation tailored to the local legal environment, protecting clients from unjust penalties and helping them navigate administrative hearings and court proceedings with clear strategies.
Field sobriety tests are designed to give officers quick, observable indicators of potential impairment, but they are inherently subjective and influenced by many non-alcohol-related factors. In Pass Christian, uneven terrain, weather conditions, nervousness, medical impairments, and officer technique can affect test performance. Understanding the science behind standardized tests, such as the horizontal gaze nystagmus, walk-and-turn, and one-leg stand, helps identify when results are unreliable. A legal review will consider the administration of tests, scoring criteria, and whether recorded observations align with procedural standards in order to form a challenge.
Beyond the immediate roadside tests, a thorough challenge considers the entire investigation: the reason for the stop, initial observations, field notes, and whether any Miranda or detention issues arose. In Pass Christian cases, body camera or dash camera footage can be decisive when it shows inconsistent officer statements or environmental factors that affected performance. A comprehensive review by a defense attorney examines potential medical conditions, witness accounts, and laboratory testing procedures that may further undermine the prosecution’s reliance on field sobriety tests as proof of impairment.
Field sobriety tests are a set of roadside assessments intended to evaluate balance, coordination, and eye movement that may indicate intoxication. Law enforcement in Mississippi often use both standardized tests developed for uniform administration and less formal observations. Officers may combine these results with breath or blood test outcomes, driving behavior, and statements to form probable cause. Understanding the limitations of these tests, and the circumstances under which they were given, helps determine whether they should carry weight at trial or in an administrative hearing. A careful review seeks to separate objective facts from subjective impressions.
When evaluating a field sobriety test challenge, important elements include officer training records, the conditions at the scene, precise test administration, and available video evidence. Defense review typically looks at whether the standardized tests were scored using accepted criteria, whether the suspect was provided clear instructions, and if traffic or environmental hazards interfered. Other processes include requesting evidence preservation, subpoenaing reports and footage, consulting with medical or scientific consultants as needed, and preparing arguments for hearings that explain why test results are unreliable or inadmissible in Pass Christian and Harrison County proceedings.
This glossary explains common terms you will encounter when contesting field sobriety tests. Knowing these definitions can help you follow the legal process and understand the issues your attorney may raise. Terms include standardized field sobriety tests, probable cause, administrative license suspension, nystagmus, and chain of custody. Clear definitions make it easier to understand motions, hearing strategy, and potential outcomes. We provide plain-language explanations to help Pass Christian residents navigate conversations with counsel and make informed decisions about next steps after a DUI stop.
Standardized Field Sobriety Tests are a set of validated exercises developed to help officers assess whether a driver shows signs consistent with impairment. The commonly used SFSTs include the horizontal gaze nystagmus test, the walk-and-turn, and the one-leg stand. Each test has specific instructions and scoring guidelines intended to reduce variability, but real-world conditions often interfere with proper administration. In Pass Christian, conditions like sand on road shoulders, poor lighting, or nearby foot traffic can affect performance and thus the reliability of SFST results when presented in court.
Probable cause refers to the reasonable belief, based on facts and circumstances, that a person has committed an offense and justifies arrest or further detention. In the context of DUI stops and field sobriety tests, officers must have probable cause to place a driver under arrest for impaired driving. Challenging whether probable cause existed often involves examining initial observations, the officer’s reasons for stopping the vehicle, and whether the officer’s interpretation of test results met legal standards required to escalate the encounter into an arrest or request for chemical testing.
Horizontal Gaze Nystagmus measures involuntary eye movements thought to be more pronounced under the influence of certain substances. Officers trained in this test observe the eyes for specific indicators while the subject follows a moving object. However, HGN results can be affected by medical conditions, fatigue, or improper testing technique. Challenging HGN evidence may involve questioning whether the officer followed proper procedure, whether lighting and observation were adequate, and whether alternative explanations account for the observed eye movements in the Pass Christian environment.
Administrative License Suspension is a separate civil process where the state may suspend driving privileges after an arrest or refusal for chemical testing. This administrative action is distinct from criminal charges and typically has its own hearing process with strict deadlines for contesting the suspension. In Harrison County and Pass Christian, timely action to request an administrative hearing is essential to preserve driving privileges. A strong challenge to the ALS can prevent automatic suspension and may involve contesting the validity of the stop, arrest, or testing procedures.
When deciding how to challenge field sobriety test results in Pass Christian, clients often choose between a focused, tactical approach and a broader, comprehensive strategy. A limited approach targets a specific defect in the test administration or documentation to achieve a narrow goal, such as excluding a piece of evidence. A comprehensive approach examines every phase of the stop and testing process, gathers video and witness evidence, and prepares for administrative and criminal hearings. Understanding the likely benefits, costs, and timeframes for each option helps clients decide which course best protects their interests in Harrison County cases.
A limited approach may be appropriate when the issue is a single, identifiable procedural error or when critical evidence is missing, such as absent dash cam footage or incomplete test documentation. In Pass Christian cases, if an officer failed to follow the specific instructions for a standardized test or neglected to score properly, targeting that single deficiency can sometimes lead to suppression of the test result or make the evidence less persuasive to prosecutors and judges. This narrower strategy can be faster and less costly while still yielding meaningful benefits for the client.
Another time to employ a limited approach is when environmental or situational factors clearly affected one test but leave other evidence intact. For example, poor lighting, heavy rain, or a sloped shoulder in Pass Christian might render a walk-and-turn unreliable while other observations remain viable. Highlighting the environmental interference on that specific test can reduce its weight in the case, possibly leading to an improved negotiation or outcome without an extensive, full-scale investigation into every aspect of the arrest and testing sequence.
A comprehensive legal strategy is often necessary when the stakes are high, such as when there are prior DUI convictions, commercial driving implications, or potential jail time. In Pass Christian and Harrison County, a full review uncovers additional avenues for defense, including medical conditions that mimic impairment, hidden procedural violations, inconsistencies in officer reports, or flaws in chemical testing. Addressing the case from multiple angles increases the likelihood of favorable outcomes at criminal trial, plea negotiations, or administrative license hearings by reducing the overall weight of the prosecution’s evidence.
Comprehensive representation also helps protect long-term consequences like license suspensions, employment impacts, and insurance rate increases that can follow a DUI conviction. For Pass Christian residents who depend on driving for work or family responsibilities, preserving the ability to drive legally is a top priority. A thorough legal review addresses both criminal and administrative aspects of the case, pursues evidence suppression where warranted, and can negotiate solutions or diversion alternatives that reduce collateral damage to professional and personal life.
A comprehensive approach improves the chance to identify multiple weaknesses in the prosecution’s case, from officer actions to test administration and chemical analysis. In Pass Christian, collecting all available video evidence, medical records, and witness statements can reveal alternative explanations for behavior that officers attributed to impairment. Comprehensive preparation also positions a client for better negotiations, more effective administrative hearing presentation, and trial readiness, creating leverage that can result in reduced charges, dismissed evidence, or preservation of driving privileges.
Comprehensively addressing a DUI matter reduces the risk that overlooked evidence or missed deadlines will cause harm later in the process. It ensures that defenses to both criminal charges and administrative suspensions are pursued, including challenges to probable cause, test reliability, and conditions that influenced performance. For Pass Christian residents, this methodical approach protects short-term freedoms and long-term opportunities, helping to minimize the disruption that a DUI arrest can cause to employment, family responsibilities, and insurance standing.
One major benefit of a comprehensive approach is the early preservation and thorough review of evidence such as video, officer notes, and chemical test records. In many Pass Christian cases, securing dash cam or body cam footage quickly can reveal key facts about the stop, lighting conditions, or test administration. Early action also helps recover witness contact information and prevents evidence loss. This careful evidence management strengthens challenges to field sobriety test results and provides a clearer picture of the incident for hearings and potential trial.
A complete and documented defense creates a stronger position for negotiations with prosecutors and administrative decision-makers. In Harrison County and Pass Christian, detailed evidence gathering and clear legal arguments can lead to reduced charges, diversion options, or avoidance of lengthy suspensions. When attorneys can present well-supported challenges to the reliability of field sobriety tests, prosecutors may be more willing to consider alternatives. A comprehensive strategy increases the likelihood of achieving practical, client-centered resolutions that limit long-term consequences.
After an arrest or roadside test in Pass Christian, take steps to preserve evidence by requesting any available video and noting the names or badge numbers of involved officers. If possible, write down everything you remember about the stop, including location, lighting, weather, and any unusual conditions that might have affected test performance. Contact an attorney promptly so preservation requests and subpoenas are made before footage is overwritten. Early preservation increases the chance that key details supporting a challenge to field sobriety test results will remain available for review in hearings or trial.
Exercise your right to remain silent when appropriate and avoid long explanations without counsel present, as offhand comments can be used against you. Politely comply with lawful commands but be careful about admitting to drinking or making statements that could be misconstrued. After an arrest, consult with legal counsel before speaking with prosecutors or investigators. In Pass Christian cases, following strategic legal advice helps preserve defenses for administrative hearings and criminal proceedings and reduces the risk of inadvertently strengthening the prosecution’s narrative.
Challenging field sobriety tests can prevent unreliable roadside observations from producing a conviction or an automatic administrative suspension. For drivers in Pass Christian, the consequences of a DUI conviction may include loss of driving privileges, higher insurance premiums, and difficulties with employment or professional licensing. When test administration, environmental conditions, or medical issues call results into question, a legal challenge may lead to suppressed evidence, reduced charges, or alternative resolutions that preserve driving privileges. Early legal action improves the chances of achieving a favorable outcome.
A proper legal challenge also helps ensure fairness in the justice process by holding law enforcement to procedural standards and questioning unreliable scientific inferences. In Harrison County, timely legal representation can secure crucial video evidence, witness statements, and officer records that paint a fuller picture of the stop. Pursuing a challenge protects both immediate interests like avoiding license suspension and long-term interests such as protecting reputation and employment, making it a sound option for many people facing DUI-related allegations in Pass Christian.
Common circumstances that prompt a challenge include poor lighting or unstable surfaces at the stop, medical conditions that impair balance, inexperienced or improperly trained officers, and missing or overwritten video evidence. In Pass Christian, factors like beachside conditions, narrow shoulders, or uneven pavement often interfere with proper test performance. Other situations include ambiguous officer reports, inconsistent statements on body or dash cam footage, and procedural errors in requesting or administering chemical tests that raise questions about the overall accuracy of the impairment determination.
Environmental issues such as rain, sand, uneven pavement, or poor lighting can significantly affect the outcome of balance and coordination tests. In Pass Christian, proximity to coastal roads or soft shoulders may make it unreasonable to expect a driver to perform a walk-and-turn or one-leg stand accurately. Pointing out these conditions can be an effective component of a challenge, since standardized testing assumes a controlled environment. Documenting the scene, obtaining video, and gathering witness observations can corroborate claims that the testing environment undermined the validity of results.
Medical issues such as inner ear disorders, joint problems, neurological conditions, or the effects of prescription medications can cause poor performance on field sobriety tests without alcohol or drugs being involved. Drivers who have legitimate physical limitations should gather and present medical records and statements from treating providers to explain observed impairments. In Pass Christian, demonstrating that medical or physical factors account for test performance can shift the focus away from alleged intoxication and toward a more accurate understanding of the driver’s condition.
Problems with how an officer administers or documents field sobriety tests often provide grounds for challenge. Officers may give unclear instructions, fail to follow standardized protocols, or make inconsistent observations between written reports and recorded video. Additionally, training records may be incomplete or unavailable. In Pass Christian cases, careful review of officer reports, body cam footage, and training documentation can reveal inconsistencies that reduce the weight of test results and support motions to suppress or arguments for reduced charges.
Housley Law offers focused representation for drivers facing DUI accusations in Pass Christian and throughout Harrison County. We prioritize quick evidence preservation, detailed review of field sobriety and chemical testing procedures, and clear communication about available defenses. Our approach is to build a defensible record by obtaining dash and body camera footage, officer reports, and relevant medical records, then presenting targeted arguments in administrative hearings or court. Clients benefit from a practical, action-oriented strategy that seeks to reduce the impact of a DUI arrest on driving privileges and daily obligations.
We understand the local court systems and administrative processes in Mississippi, and we prepare each case with careful attention to both immediate and long-term consequences. For Pass Christian residents, that means focusing on preserving driving ability, addressing insurance concerns, and exploring options such as plea alternatives or negotiated resolutions when appropriate. Our work includes explaining potential outcomes, advising on the risks and benefits of various strategies, and advocating for solutions that align with the client’s personal and professional needs.
From the initial consultation through hearings and possible trial, we aim to provide thorough representation that protects clients’ rights and livelihoods. Whether the best path involves challenging field sobriety tests, contesting chemical testing procedures, or negotiating with prosecutors, our goal is to reduce disruption to daily life and reach practical outcomes. Residents of Pass Christian can expect timely communication, careful documentation, and a commitment to exploring every defensible avenue to limit the consequences of DUI allegations.
Our process begins with a prompt case review to identify deadlines and preserve perishable evidence like video and testing records. We gather police reports, request dash and body camera footage, obtain training and certification records for officers involved, and collect medical documentation when applicable. Next, we analyze the stop, test administration, and subsequent chemical testing for weaknesses. We then develop a strategy for administrative hearings and criminal proceedings that may include motions to suppress, negotiated resolutions, or trial preparation designed to protect driving privileges and minimize long-term consequences for Pass Christian clients.
At intake we confirm key deadlines and immediately request preservation of video, lab records, and officer files. Early steps include documenting the scene, obtaining witness information, and ensuring that footage is not overwritten. This early preservation is essential in Pass Christian cases where body and dash cam recordings can be erased after a set period. Gathering medical records and vehicle information at this stage secures the foundation for later challenges to field sobriety test results and supports both administrative and criminal defense planning.
We immediately serve requests for dash and body camera footage, officer notes, and dispatch logs to prevent loss of evidence. Video often clarifies discrepancies between written reports and what actually occurred during a stop in Pass Christian. Securing these items early lets us assess officer positioning, lighting, surface conditions, and test instructions, which are frequently central to contesting test reliability. Timely preservation also supports motions to suppress evidence that relies on flawed or incomplete documentation.
We collect detailed statements from the client and any witnesses while memories are fresh, documenting observations about the stop, the officer’s behavior, and environmental conditions. Witness accounts can corroborate claims about lighting, road conditions, or the presence of distractions that affected test performance. In Pass Christian, timely witness interviews and recorded statements help reconstruct the scene and strengthen defenses aimed at undermining the credibility of field sobriety test results and the officer’s conclusions.
After preserving evidence, we analyze it to identify weaknesses in the prosecution’s case and develop a tailored strategy for administrative hearings and criminal defense. This includes reviewing test administration for compliance with recognized procedures, checking chemical testing protocols, and evaluating officer training records. We also consider medical and environmental factors, consult with outside evaluators when needed, and decide whether to pursue suppression motions or settlement discussions. The goal is a defensible plan that addresses immediate suspension risk and longer-term criminal exposure in Pass Christian cases.
We carefully review how field sobriety tests were administered against established protocols, looking for deviations that compromise reliability. Officer training and performance records are examined to ensure proper technique and documentation. Any divergence between reported observations and recorded footage is noted, and scoring inconsistencies are highlighted. This detailed analysis helps determine whether the test results should be admitted or given diminished weight at hearings or trial in Harrison County and Pass Christian venues.
We investigate chemical testing procedures and chain of custody for breath and blood samples, checking for compliance with lab protocols and potential contamination or calibration problems. Errors or procedural lapses in chemical testing can be decisive in reducing or dismissing charges. For Pass Christian clients, a thorough lab review can reveal administrative errors or equipment problems that undermine reliability, and that information may be used in negotiations or motions to exclude test results in court or at administrative hearings.
With preserved evidence and a well-developed strategy, we proceed to administrative hearings, plea negotiations, or trial preparation. We file motions as appropriate, present arguments to challenge the admissibility of field sobriety test results, and advocate for reduced penalties where dismissal is not possible. Preparation includes crafting persuasive written motions, conducting witness preparation, and ensuring the client understands the process and potential outcomes. Our objective is to secure the best realistic resolution while protecting driving privileges and minimizing collateral consequences in Pass Christian and Harrison County proceedings.
At administrative hearings to contest license suspensions, we present evidence that questions the legality of the stop, the validity of tests, and the procedures followed by officers. Successfully contesting the administrative case can prevent automatic suspension and maintain driving privileges. We prepare exhibits, cross-examine witnesses, and explain technical points about tests and procedures in accessible terms for hearing officers. For clients in Pass Christian, this advocacy often reduces immediate disruption to work and family responsibilities by preserving the ability to drive pending resolution of criminal charges.
If the case proceeds in criminal court, we continue to press challenges to field sobriety tests, chemical testing, and probable cause. Trial readiness includes witness preparation, expert consultation when needed, and developing cross-examination strategies to expose inconsistencies. We also engage in plea negotiations when appropriate, always with the client’s goals in mind. In Pass Christian, careful courtroom advocacy aims to reduce or avoid convictions that carry heavy consequences for driving privileges, employment, and long-term personal records.
Yes, you can challenge field sobriety test results in Pass Christian by demonstrating that the tests were improperly administered, affected by environmental or medical factors, or otherwise unreliable. A legal review examines officer technique, documentation, and available video to determine whether the test results should be given weight in criminal prosecution or at administrative hearings. Challenges may include motions to suppress evidence, cross-examination of officer testimony, and presentation of medical or environmental explanations for poor performance. Each case depends on its specific facts, which is why detailed evidence preservation and review are essential. Successful challenges often rely on early action to secure video recordings, officer records, and medical documentation. In Pass Christian, timely requests for dash or body camera footage and preservation of evidence can reveal inconsistencies between written reports and actual events. Presenting these discrepancies at administrative hearings or in court can lead to reduced charges, exclusion of unreliable evidence, or more favorable plea outcomes, all of which can mitigate the long-term impact of a DUI stop.
Key evidence for disputing a field sobriety test includes dash cam and body cam footage, officer notes, training records, and any contemporaneous witness statements. Video can show lighting, surface conditions, and whether the officer provided clear instructions—details often missing from written reports. Training and certification records may reveal whether the administering officer was properly trained and followed appropriate protocols. Medical records documenting conditions that affect balance or coordination can also be powerful evidence in explaining poor test performance without alcohol or drugs. Chemical test results, like breath or blood tests, and their associated lab records and chain of custody documentation are important as well when present, since they can corroborate or contradict officer observations. An attorney will request and review all available evidence to identify contradictions, procedural errors, and exculpatory material. Bringing these elements together supports strong legal arguments at both administrative hearings and criminal proceedings in Pass Christian.
You should contact an attorney as soon as possible after a DUI stop in Pass Christian to preserve critical evidence and meet administrative deadlines. Many departments retain dash and body camera footage for only a limited time, and lab documentation or officer training records may also become harder to obtain with delay. Early contact allows a lawyer to request preservation orders and start investigating the circumstances of the stop while memories are fresh and evidence is intact. Prompt legal consultation also helps ensure timely action on administrative license matters, since Mississippi has strict deadlines to request hearings that protect driving privileges. Immediate legal guidance can clarify your options, advise on interactions with authorities, and begin building a defense strategy tailored to the facts of your stop and local procedures in Harrison County.
Challenging a field sobriety test can help prevent or delay administrative license suspension if a hearing is requested within required timeframes. The administrative process in Mississippi is distinct from criminal court and often moves quickly, so timely representation is important to preserve driving privileges. At the hearing, showing that tests were improperly administered or that other factors accounted for observed behavior can persuade the hearing officer to deny or limit suspension. While a successful challenge at an administrative hearing does not guarantee dismissal of criminal charges, it can preserve immediate driving rights and reduce collateral consequences. In Pass Christian cases, combining administrative defense with criminal defense strategies provides the best chance to protect both short-term transportation needs and long-term outcomes.
Yes, certain medical conditions and prescribed medications can affect balance, coordination, and speech, leading to poor performance on field sobriety tests even when a person is not impaired by alcohol. Conditions such as inner ear disorders, neurological issues, chronic pain, or side effects from medications can all influence test outcomes. Documenting these conditions through medical records and physician statements is essential to explaining test performance to prosecutors or hearing officers. A legal strategy often includes gathering medical documentation early and presenting those records alongside video evidence and officer reports. By demonstrating alternative reasons for poor test results, a defense can undermine the prosecution’s assertion that test performance equates to intoxication, which is particularly relevant in Pass Christian and Harrison County proceedings.
Dash cam and body cam video are commonly used by law enforcement and can be available in Pass Christian cases, but availability and retention policies vary. Video can be critical in reviewing the accuracy of officer observations, verifying environmental conditions, and confirming how tests were administered. An attorney will file preservation requests and subpoenas as early as possible to ensure footage is not erased or overwritten, since departments often maintain recordings for only a limited period. If video exists, it can significantly strengthen a challenge by showing discrepancies between reports and actual events. Even when video is not available, other preserved evidence such as dispatch logs, witness statements, and officer notes can still be analyzed to build a defense and question the reliability of field sobriety test conclusions.
Yes, road and weather conditions can meaningfully affect field sobriety test results and may be grounds for challenging their reliability. Factors like wet or sandy shoulders, wind, darkness, or uneven surfaces can impair balance and coordination independent of intoxication. In Pass Christian, proximity to coastal roads and unique local conditions make it especially important to document the scene and gather evidence showing how environmental factors interfered with test performance. Proving that these conditions existed often requires prompt evidence preservation, witness statements, and video if available. Demonstrating that testing assumptions were not met weakens the prosecution’s reliance on those tests and supports arguments for exclusion or reduced weight of the results in administrative and criminal proceedings.
Common officer errors include giving incomplete or confusing instructions, failing to demonstrate tests, incorrectly scoring or recording results, and allowing environmental factors to influence administration. Other issues include improperly timed observations, inconsistent reports compared to video, and lack of adequate training documentation. Identifying these errors requires careful review of officer notes, training records, and any body or dash cam footage to compare reported procedures with what actually occurred. When such mistakes are found, they can form the basis for motions to suppress or arguments that the test results are unreliable. Highlighting procedural lapses and inconsistencies helps shift the focus away from test outcomes and toward the many reasons a performance observation may not reflect impairment.
Administrative hearings focus on whether the state may suspend your driver’s license after an arrest or refusal and operate under different rules than criminal court. These hearings are typically faster and centered on administrative standards rather than proving guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Success at the administrative level can prevent automatic license suspension and preserve driving privileges pending the outcome of criminal charges. Timely action is required to request hearings and challenge the administrative measures in Mississippi. Criminal court proceedings address criminal charges and potential penalties such as fines, community service, or incarceration. While the outcomes are related, each process has its own procedures and deadlines. Effective defense plans in Pass Christian address both tracks simultaneously, ensuring that administrative deadlines are met while building criminal defense strategies to minimize long-term consequences.
At the scene, remain polite and provide required identification, but avoid making admissions about drinking or impairment. If asked to perform tests, do your best to comply but avoid volunteering explanations that might be used against you later. Take note of conditions such as lighting, road surface, and weather, and try to record officer names or badge numbers. These details can be valuable later when your attorney reviews the case and seeks preservation of evidence. Contact legal counsel as soon as practicable so preservation requests and administrative deadlines can be handled promptly. Early legal involvement increases the chance of securing video and other perishable evidence, which can be decisive in contesting field sobriety test results and protecting driving privileges in Pass Christian and Harrison County proceedings.
"*" indicates required fields