Being charged with boating under the influence in Kearney Park can feel overwhelming and raise immediate concerns about fines, license consequences, and future records. Housley Law represents clients across Madison County, Mississippi, offering deliberate and thorough legal representation for BUI matters on local lakes and waterways. If you or a loved one faces an allegation while operating a watercraft near Kearney Park, the first step is understanding your rights and options. We focus on the specifics of Mississippi boating laws, evidence handling, and procedural defenses to help you make informed decisions about next steps and potential outcomes.
A BUI arrest can involve field sobriety testing on docks, breath tests at nearby facilities, and police reports that require careful review. In Kearney Park, local factors such as patrol procedures, witness statements, and the conditions at the time of the incident may affect the strength of the state’s case. Housley Law is prepared to investigate the circumstances surrounding a BUI stop, challenge testing methods where appropriate, and pursue negotiations or court strategies tailored to the individual. Early, proactive action often improves outcomes by preserving evidence and identifying legal issues before critical deadlines pass.
Local legal representation matters because boating under the influence laws interact with community practices, local courts, and nearby law enforcement procedures. A lawyer familiar with the Kearney Park area can quickly assess how local patrols document stops, where evidence was collected, and which legal arguments are most persuasive to prosecutors and judges in Madison County. Proper representation can reduce penalties, protect driving or boating privileges, and, in some cases, lead to reduced charges or dismissals. Clients also benefit from clear communication about timelines, possible plea options, and the long-term implications of conviction versus negotiated resolutions.
Housley Law is a criminal defense and DUI firm serving Kearney Park and surrounding communities throughout Mississippi. The firm’s approach centers on thorough case review, fact investigation, and attention to procedural safeguards that affect boating under the influence prosecutions. Attorneys work to evaluate evidence such as BAC results, officer observations, and witness statements while advising clients on immediate steps after a BUI charge. Our team emphasizes clear communication about potential consequences and realistic strategies, whether pursuing negotiations with prosecutors, preparing for trial, or addressing collateral administrative issues related to licenses or registrations.
Boating under the influence (BUI) laws in Mississippi are intended to keep waterways safe by prohibiting operation of a vessel while impaired by alcohol or other drugs. In Kearney Park and across Madison County, officers may initiate stops on lakes and rivers when they observe unsafe operation or receive reports of intoxicated behavior. Understanding the statutory definitions, including what constitutes impairment and how blood alcohol concentration may be measured on watercraft, helps individuals recognize the charges they face. The legal process often involves both criminal proceedings and administrative matters that can affect privileges and records after an arrest.
When facing a BUI charge, it is important to know how evidence is gathered and evaluated, and which defenses may be relevant in a given case. Common lines of defense involve the validity of sobriety testing, the circumstances under which an officer initiated contact, and the reliability of BAC measurement. Kearney Park cases can also be affected by environmental factors, witness reliability, and whether proper Miranda or arrest procedures were followed. Early review of police reports, witness statements, and any available video is essential to crafting a defense strategy that addresses both factual and legal vulnerabilities in the prosecution’s case.
In Mississippi, a person operates a vessel under the influence when they control the boat while impaired by alcohol or drugs to an extent that they cannot operate safely. The legal definitions evaluate impairment using officer observations, field tests adapted for watercraft, and BAC readings when available. In Kearney Park, local officers may rely on visual signs of impairment, erratic operation, or accidents on the water as probable cause. It is important to review how the stop occurred, whether the operator consented to testing, and whether any testing devices were used and maintained correctly to determine how best to challenge the charge.
A BUI case typically includes several core elements: proof of operation or control of the vessel, evidence of impairment or intoxication, and lawful procedures by law enforcement officers in stopping and testing the operator. The legal process moves from arrest or citation through potential arraignment, discovery, plea negotiations, or trial. Administrative consequences, such as impact on licenses or registrations, may run concurrently. In Kearney Park, careful attention to timelines, notice requirements, and testing protocols is important because mistakes in procedure can provide meaningful defenses or grounds to exclude certain evidence.
Understanding the key legal terms used in boating under the influence cases clarifies how charges are evaluated and what options are available. Terms often encountered in Kearney Park cases include probable cause, BAC, administrative suspension, operating or in actual physical control, and evidentiary testing standards. Knowing these definitions helps you follow discussions with attorneys, understand police reports, and recognize the consequences of plea offers or court rulings. Clear definitions also make it easier to spot procedural or evidentiary issues that may affect the outcome of a case.
Probable cause refers to the reasonable belief by an officer that a person has committed an offense, based on facts and circumstances within the officer’s knowledge. In the context of a BUI stop on Kearney Park waterways, probable cause could stem from observed unsafe boat operation, slurred speech, impaired coordination, or reports from other boaters. Establishing whether probable cause existed is often central to challenging the legality of a stop or arrest. A thorough review of the officer’s report, witness statements, and any available video can reveal whether the legal threshold for probable cause was met.
Blood Alcohol Concentration, often measured as a percentage, reflects the amount of alcohol present in a person’s bloodstream. BUI cases may involve BAC readings taken by breath or blood testing, and the accuracy and administration of these tests can be contested. In Kearney Park, the conditions under which tests are administered, whether proper procedures were followed, and the calibration and maintenance of testing equipment are all relevant to assessing the reliability of a BAC result. Challenges to BAC evidence can sometimes limit the weight of that evidence in court.
The concept of operating or being in actual physical control of a vessel addresses whether the person had the ability to maneuver or operate the watercraft, even if the vessel was not underway at the moment. In Kearney Park incidents, a person found intoxicated on a docked boat may still be considered to be in control depending on circumstances like keys present, engine status, or intent to operate. Determining control often requires a close factual inquiry into the operator’s relationship with the vessel at the time of the stop or citation.
Administrative consequences refer to noncriminal penalties that may follow a BUI arrest, such as restrictions or suspensions related to licenses, registrations, or boating privileges. In Mississippi, administrative actions can proceed alongside criminal charges and may have their own separate procedures and timelines. Addressing administrative matters promptly in Kearney Park is important because failure to respond or appeal in time can result in automatic suspensions or other penalties. A coordinated approach can help manage both criminal and administrative risks after a BUI incident.
When facing a BUI charge in Kearney Park, defendants often weigh a narrow defensive approach against a more comprehensive strategy. A limited approach can focus on one or two specific issues, such as contesting the validity of a BAC test or seeking a plea to reduced charges. A comprehensive strategy examines all available avenues, including procedural challenges, witness interviews, evidentiary motions, and administrative appeals. Choosing between these options depends on the strength of the evidence, the client’s goals, and the potential long-term consequences for record and licenses in Madison County.
A limited approach may be appropriate when the prosecution’s case hinges on a single piece of evidence that can be reliably challenged, such as a flawed breath test or an improperly documented stop. In such circumstances, focusing efforts on that narrow issue can produce favorable results without the time and expense of a full-scale investigation. For Kearney Park defendants, a targeted motion to exclude unreliable testing or to suppress improperly obtained evidence can sometimes result in reduced charges or dismissal if the judge finds the state’s proof compromised by the identified flaw.
Some clients prefer a quicker resolution to limit disruption and return to their daily routines, particularly when potential penalties are modest and the risks of a broader defense are disproportionate. In those cases, negotiating with prosecutors for reduced charges or alternative dispositions may make sense. In Kearney Park, attorneys can assess whether streamlined negotiations are realistic given the facts and whether the client’s priorities for avoiding protracted court time or minimizing immediate consequences justify a narrower strategy focused on plea discussions or limited motions.
A comprehensive defense is often warranted when several aspects of the prosecution’s evidence are questionable—such as inconsistent witness accounts, procedural mistakes, and questionable testing practices. In Kearney Park, gathering statements from other boaters, reviewing maintenance records for testing devices, and investigating officer training can reveal cumulative weaknesses that materially affect the case. A thorough approach preserves all available defensive options, supports pretrial motions, and positions the client to pursue the most favorable resolution based on a full picture of the facts and law.
When potential penalties are severe, when a conviction would have major consequences for employment or licensure, or when prior offenses increase exposure, a comprehensive approach becomes important. Attorneys in Madison County will examine long-term implications, explore diversion or mitigation options, and prepare defenses that consider both immediate charges and collateral impacts. For Kearney Park residents, an intensive defense can also include outreach to witnesses, expert testing review, and persistent negotiation efforts designed to minimize cumulative legal and practical consequences.
A comprehensive approach to a boating under the influence charge increases the chances of identifying favorable legal issues, procedural defects, and mitigation opportunities. By reviewing the entire evidence set, preserving forensic materials, and conducting witness interviews, attorneys can build a more robust defense. In Kearney Park, this might reveal local factors that weaken the state’s case or support plea negotiations. Clients also benefit from coordinated handling of both criminal and administrative consequences, which can limit long-term effects on records and privileges when addressed in a timely and methodical manner.
Comprehensive representation also provides clarity about likely outcomes and consistent advocacy at every stage of the process. Instead of reacting to individual developments, the legal team proactively plans for hearings, discovery requests, and possible trial preparation. This measured planning helps clients make informed choices about plea offers, diversion options, or going to trial. For those in Kearney Park, the effort to gather complete information and pursue all viable defenses can translate into negotiated resolutions with reduced penalties or, in some cases, dismissals where the state’s case is shown to be deficient.
A thorough evidence review ensures every piece of the prosecution’s case is examined for accuracy and reliability, from officer reports to testing device logs and witness accounts. In Kearney Park BUI matters, this review can identify inconsistencies, gaps, or procedural errors that may affect the admissibility or weight of evidence. Collecting and preserving relevant records early often creates opportunities to challenge the state’s proof, and it also gives clients a clearer understanding of their position so they can make strategic decisions about potential plea negotiations or trial preparation.
Comprehensive preparation improves the ability to negotiate favorable outcomes with prosecutors by presenting well-developed arguments, evidence issues, and mitigation factors. For residents of Kearney Park, showing that a case has been carefully reviewed and that legitimate concerns exist regarding testing, procedure, or witness reliability can lead to reduced charges or alternative dispositions. Even when a case proceeds toward trial, thorough preparation enhances courtroom performance by ensuring that motions, cross-examinations, and evidentiary strategies are grounded in complete factual understanding and sound legal reasoning.
After any interaction with law enforcement on the water, try to photograph the scene, note the names and contact information of witnesses, and record any observable conditions that might be relevant later. Details such as weather, lighting, and the position of the vessel can affect perceptions of operation and impairment. In Kearney Park, collecting this information as soon as possible helps preserve facts that may change or disappear. Write down officer names, badge numbers, and the sequence of events while they are fresh in your memory so your attorney can evaluate and corroborate key points during the investigation.
Preserving evidence such as maintenance records for alcohol testing devices, receipts, or communications that relate to the incident can be valuable. If there was a digital recording or video from a nearby dock camera or personal device, take steps to secure it or to inform your attorney so they can request preservation. In Kearney Park, timely action to secure evidence prevents it from being lost or overwritten. Informing your attorney about any potential sources of video, witness contact information, or scene photos helps shape investigative requests and pretrial motions to protect your interests.
Legal representation matters because boating under the influence charges can carry both criminal penalties and administrative consequences that affect boating privileges and public records. A lawyer reviews the arrest, identifies possible defenses, and negotiates with prosecutors to seek lesser outcomes when appropriate. For Kearney Park residents, a careful legal response can help minimize fines, avoid license suspensions, or reduce long-term impacts from a conviction. Representation also ensures procedural safeguards are observed and that important evidence is not overlooked during critical early stages of the case.
Another reason to obtain representation is to protect future opportunities that may be affected by a conviction, including employment or insurance consequences. An attorney can advise on diversion programs, monitor deadlines for administrative appeals, and coordinate a defense strategy that accounts for the client’s broader life circumstances. In Madison County, where local norms and court practices influence outcomes, having consistent legal counsel helps clients navigate options, understand realistic expectations, and pursue the path that best addresses both immediate and long-range concerns related to a BUI charge.
Individuals often need BUI defense after being stopped for erratic boat operation, being involved in a collision on the water, or following a call from another boater reporting unsafe behavior. Incidents can also arise during dockside checks or when officers observe signs of impairment while the vessel is moored. These situations can vary widely in how evidence is collected and documented. In Kearney Park, prompt legal review helps determine whether procedures were followed correctly, whether testing met standards, and which witnesses and evidence sources should be pursued to assess the strength of the state’s case.
An officer may initiate contact after observing a vessel behaving unsafely, such as weaving, excessive speed, or failure to keep to navigable channels. These observations can form the basis for a BUI investigation if coupled with signs of impairment. After such a stop in Kearney Park, it is important to document the timeline and to review how the officer recorded the behavior. Statements about operation, the presence of passengers, and environmental factors can influence whether the behavior was actually dangerous or subjectively perceived as such by the officer.
Collisions on the water or damage to docks and buoys often draw law enforcement attention and can lead to BUI investigations if impairment is suspected. In these situations, there may be physical evidence, witness statements, and reporting requirements that complicate the legal picture. For Kearney Park residents, collisions can increase the scrutiny of officers and the state, making it especially important to secure witness contact information and to have legal counsel quickly assess liability and any related criminal exposure.
Sometimes a BUI investigation begins with a dockside inquiry or a report from another boater about suspected intoxication. These encounters can escalate if officers observe signs they interpret as impairment or if they request testing. It is important to preserve context about the interaction, including any statements made and the manner in which tests were requested or administered. In Kearney Park cases arising from third-party reports, investigating the credibility and proximity of those reports can be a meaningful part of building a defense.
Housley Law focuses on criminal defense and DUI-related matters across Mississippi, including boating under the influence cases in Kearney Park. Our legal team conducts timely investigations, reviews technical evidence, and communicates clearly with clients about options and likely outcomes. We emphasize safeguarding rights during every step of the process and exploring potential defenses tailored to the facts of each incident. For local clients, this means attention to Madison County procedures, timely filings, and coordination of criminal and administrative responses when necessary.
Choosing representation helps ensure procedural protections are enforced and that critical deadlines are not missed, such as those for administrative appeals or discovery requests. Our office assists clients in understanding how a conviction might affect boating privileges, insurance rates, and employment circumstances, and we work to limit negative repercussions wherever possible. For Kearney Park residents, we also place importance on proactive evidence preservation and thorough communication with clients so they can participate meaningfully in decisions about their cases.
When dealing with a BUI matter, clients benefit from focused advocacy that addresses both legal defenses and practical concerns. Housley Law guides clients through initial appearances, negotiations, and any necessary hearings while keeping them informed about strategy and next steps. Our goal is to protect clients’ immediate interests and long-term prospects by seeking the best possible resolution under the facts and the law. If you face a BUI charge in Kearney Park, prompt consultation ensures deadlines are met and meaningful defenses are prepared.
Our process begins with a thorough intake to review the details of the stop or arrest, including officer reports, witness accounts, and any available test results. We then gather and preserve evidence, request discovery from the prosecution, and evaluate potential motions to challenge the legality or reliability of evidence. Throughout the process, we communicate options for plea negotiations, diversion alternatives, or trial preparation. For Kearney Park matters, we pay special attention to local procedural practices and coordinate criminal defense alongside any administrative responses that may be necessary.
At the outset, we collect all available documentation from the arrest, including police reports, photos, and any testing records. Early preservation requests are sent for body camera footage, testing device logs, and any nearby surveillance that may be relevant. This initial phase is critical to ensure evidence is not lost and to identify immediate defenses. For Kearney Park residents, prompt action also allows attorneys to identify witnesses and gather statements while memories are fresh, creating a stronger foundation for the next stages of case development.
We submit formal discovery requests to obtain police notes, calibration records for testing equipment, and any communications related to the stop. These documents are analyzed to assess adherence to legal protocols and to uncover inconsistencies in the state’s account. In Kearney Park BUI cases, technical records and officer documentation often reveal critical details about timing, procedures, and opportunities to challenge evidence. Early discovery enables timely motions and informs whether negotiation or further litigation is the most appropriate course of action.
On-site investigation can include photographing the scene, interviewing witnesses, and inspecting the vessel if relevant. This step helps reconstruct events and verify or refute key aspects of the prosecution’s narrative. Local knowledge of Kearney Park waterways and typical patrol practices can guide which details to prioritize. Gathering these facts early increases the chance of preserving crucial evidence and supports more informed discussions with prosecutors or preparation for hearings where factual disputes will be central.
After discovery and investigation, we evaluate whether to file motions to suppress evidence, challenge testing procedures, or dismiss charges based on procedural defects. Simultaneously, we pursue negotiations with prosecutors when appropriate to seek reduced charges or alternative resolutions. The choice between filing contested motions and seeking negotiation depends on the strength of the issues uncovered in discovery and the client’s preferences. In Kearney Park, well-grounded motions can significantly shift the leverage in negotiations and lead to more favorable outcomes for clients.
Pretrial motions may address the legality of the stop, the admissibility of test results, or procedural irregularities. Successful motions can exclude damaging evidence or narrow the scope of the prosecutor’s case. Preparing these motions requires careful factual support and legal research tailored to Mississippi law. For Kearney Park cases, seeking relief through motions is an essential tool when discovery reveals weaknesses in law enforcement procedures or testing protocols that undermine the reliability of the prosecution’s evidence.
When negotiation is the chosen path, we present a reasoned case for reduction or alternative disposition, supported by the factual and legal issues identified during investigation. This can include highlighting mitigation factors, questioning evidence reliability, and proposing community-based resolutions when appropriate. In Kearney Park, negotiations often consider both legal merits and the practical interests of the client, aiming to resolve matters efficiently while minimizing penalties and long-term consequences whenever an acceptable outcome can be achieved.
If resolution through negotiation is not attainable, we prepare for trial by organizing evidence, identifying witnesses, and developing cross-examination strategies. Trial preparation involves rehearsing testimony, refining legal arguments, and anticipating the prosecution’s approach. In Kearney Park, representing clients at trial may include presenting alternative explanations for observed behavior, contesting the accuracy of testing methods, and emphasizing procedural failings. Trial readiness also strengthens the position at the negotiating table, as prosecutors may reassess offers when faced with a prepared defense.
The decision to proceed to jury or bench trial is made after careful evaluation of the facts, legal issues, and the client’s goals. Preparing for either format requires detailed planning, including selecting appropriate witnesses and organizing demonstrative evidence. In Kearney Park, the decision may be influenced by local court tendencies and the nature of the evidence. Effective trial preparation focuses on exposing weaknesses in the prosecution’s case while clearly presenting the client’s account and legal defenses to the judge or jury.
Following any resolution, we handle necessary post-trial matters, such as appeals, expungement inquiries, or administrative hearings related to licenses. Addressing administrative repercussions promptly is important to limit long-term impacts on boating privileges and records. For Kearney Park clients, coordinated post-resolution steps can include filing necessary paperwork to protect interests and advising on next steps that reduce the likelihood of additional penalties. Ongoing legal support ensures all consequences are managed comprehensively.
Boating under the influence in Mississippi generally means operating or being in actual physical control of a vessel while impaired by alcohol or drugs to the extent that safe operation is compromised. Law enforcement may rely on officer observations, field sobriety-like assessments adapted for watercraft, and chemical tests to establish impairment. The precise application can vary according to the facts of each case, such as whether the vessel was underway, the condition of the operator, and any attendant safety risks. Understanding the statutory elements helps frame defenses and evaluate the prosecution’s evidence. In Kearney Park, local patrol practices and the specifics of the incident play an important role in how the law is applied. The initial report and testing procedures will be key to determining whether the state has met its burden. Early review of the stop, including witness accounts and testing records, is essential for identifying legal issues that may affect the outcome of the case and for guiding decisions about negotiation or litigation.
Chemical test results like breath or blood readings can be challenged on multiple grounds, including whether the device was properly calibrated, whether testing procedures were followed, and whether the chain of custody was preserved. For breath testing, logs showing maintenance and calibration are often relevant, and for blood tests, the handling and storage procedures matter. In Kearney Park cases, obtaining and reviewing these technical records as early as possible is critical to assessing whether the test results should be given full weight by the court. Another avenue for challenging tests is to examine the circumstances under which the test was administered, including whether the individual was given adequate notice of consequences, whether consent issues are implicated, and whether the operator’s condition could have affected test reliability. Analyzing these factors together can sometimes limit or exclude test evidence and change the dynamics of plea negotiations or trial strategy.
A BUI conviction can affect boating privileges, insurance considerations, and public records. Administrative actions may be taken separate from criminal proceedings and can include suspension or restrictions depending on the nature of the charges and the specifics of state administrative rules. Addressing administrative matters in parallel with criminal defense is important to reduce the overall impact on boating privileges and related documentation. In Kearney Park and across Madison County, the effect on licenses or registrations depends on local and state procedures, the outcome of the criminal case, and any prior history. Early legal involvement can help pursue appeals or administrative hearings when appropriate and explore alternatives that minimize long-term consequences for recreation, employment, or other boating-related activities.
Immediately following a BUI arrest, document as much as possible about the stop and any interactions with officers, including names, badge numbers, and the sequence of events. Preserve photographs, note environmental conditions, and collect witness contact information if available. Avoid making incriminating statements and request the opportunity to speak with legal counsel before answering further questions. These steps help protect legal rights and preserve evidence for later review. Contacting legal counsel promptly is advisable to ensure critical deadlines are met and to begin preservation requests for footage, testing logs, and reports. An attorney can advise on how to handle administrative notices, explain potential outcomes, and begin an investigation to evaluate the strength of the case and potential defenses specific to Kearney Park circumstances.
A BUI charge can sometimes be reduced or dismissed depending on the available evidence and the circumstances of the arrest. Negotiation with prosecutors, supported by factual or legal issues identified during discovery, can lead to reduced charges or alternative resolutions. In some cases, suppression of key evidence through pretrial motions may result in dismissal or favorable plea offers. The likelihood of reduction or dismissal depends on the strength of the state’s case and the willingness of prosecutors to negotiate based on identified weaknesses. For defendants in Kearney Park, proactive investigation and early engagement with an attorney increase the chances of achieving reduced charges. Documented procedural errors, unreliable testing, or credible witness accounts that contradict the state’s narrative often provide bargaining leverage. Each case is unique, so individual assessment is necessary to determine realistic options and potential outcomes.
The duration of a BUI case varies widely based on case complexity, court schedules, and whether the matter is resolved through negotiation or requires full trial preparation. Simple negotiated resolutions may conclude within weeks or a few months, while contested cases involving pretrial motions or trial can take several months or longer. Administrative processes related to licenses may follow a different timeline and require separate attention to deadlines for appeals or hearings. In Kearney Park, local court calendars and prosecutorial practices influence timing, as do the time needed to obtain technical records and investigate the incident. Early action to preserve evidence and pursue discovery helps avoid unnecessary delays and positions the case for resolution as promptly as practical while protecting legal rights throughout the process.
Alternatives to conviction, such as diversion programs, deferred dispositions, or negotiated plea agreements, may be available depending on the facts of the case and the defendant’s background. Prosecutors may consider alternatives where mitigating circumstances exist or where evidence is weak. Participation in approved programs can sometimes result in dismissal or reduced long-term consequences if the terms are successfully completed. Eligibility for alternatives varies in Kearney Park and across Madison County, and it often depends on prior history and the nature of the offense. An attorney can advise whether a client may qualify for diversion, what program requirements would be, and how participation could affect both the criminal record and any related administrative matters.
Local procedures and practices in Kearney Park and Madison County affect how BUI prosecutions unfold, including how evidence is documented, how aggressively charges are pursued, and customary approaches to plea negotiations. Understanding these local tendencies helps shape strategy, from whether to file certain motions to how to frame mitigation in discussions with prosecutors. Familiarity with local rules and timelines prevents missed opportunities for favorable disposition or administrative relief. Additionally, local resources such as nearby testing facilities, patrol routines, and common witness sources influence the evidence available in a case. A contextual understanding of Kearney Park’s waterways and law enforcement practices aids in targeted investigations and in assessing the plausibility of the prosecution’s account relative to local norms and expectations.
Common defenses in boating under the influence cases include challenging the legality of the stop, disputing the reliability of chemical testing, questioning chain of custody or calibration records, and disputing witness credibility. Defenses also consider whether the individual was actually in control of the vessel at the time or whether factors like medical conditions or environmental issues explain observed behavior. Each defense requires factual support uncovered through targeted investigation and discovery. In Kearney Park, combining multiple defense angles often strengthens the overall case by highlighting inconsistencies and raising reasonable doubt about the state’s narrative. Early preservation of evidence and witness statements provides the factual basis necessary to pursue these defenses effectively through motions, negotiations, or trial preparation.
To schedule a consultation with Housley Law regarding a BUI matter in Kearney Park, call our office at 662-222-0900 or visit our website to request an appointment. During the consultation, we will review the facts of the incident, discuss the charges and potential consequences, and outline initial steps for preserving evidence and responding to immediate administrative matters. Timely contact ensures important deadlines are met and evidence is preserved for review. We aim to provide clear guidance about realistic options and likely timelines so you can make informed decisions about your case. If you decide to proceed with representation, we will begin the investigation and discovery process promptly to protect your rights and pursue the best possible outcome under Mississippi law.
"*" indicates required fields