If you or a loved one faces a DUI with injury charge in Conehatta, Mississippi, the legal and personal consequences can be severe and life-changing. Housley Law focuses on criminal defense and DUI matters in Newton County and understands local court procedures, probable penalties, and the investigative steps law enforcement uses. This introduction explains what to expect in the days and weeks after arrest, initial court appearances, and how timely legal action can protect your rights and preserve important evidence and testimony that may affect the outcome of your case.
A DUI with injury charge often involves both criminal exposure and potential civil liability. In Conehatta, these cases commonly lead to complicated investigations involving medical records, accident reconstruction, and witness statements. Early coordination with counsel can help secure medical records, evaluate breath or blood test administration, and organize defense strategies tailored to the specifics of the collision and reported injuries. Understanding how criminal charges and personal injury claims can intersect is essential to making informed decisions about plea options, hearings, and potential negotiation with prosecutors or insurers.
When a DUI with injury allegation arises, the stakes include jail time, license suspension, fines, and long-term consequences for employment and insurance. A well-prepared defense can challenge key prosecution theories, examine the lawfulness of the stop and testing, and present mitigating circumstances to the court. In Conehatta, where local policing and court practices matter, skilled representation can identify weaknesses in evidence, negotiate alternative resolutions, and pursue the best possible outcome given your circumstances. Protecting your rights early can make a meaningful difference in both short-term outcomes and long-term future impact.
Housley Law is a criminal defense and DUI law firm serving Conehatta and the surrounding areas in Mississippi. Our team has defended clients in Newton County courts and understands local procedures, key judges, and how prosecutors build DUI with injury cases. We emphasize clear communication, careful case analysis, and practical defense strategies that consider both immediate legal needs and long-term consequences. If you are facing charges, we will review police reports, medical documentation, and investigative evidence to develop a tailored plan that protects your rights and seeks the most favorable resolution available.
DUI with injury charges typically arise when an alleged impaired driver is involved in a collision that causes bodily harm to another person. In Mississippi, proving such a charge requires showing that the driver was operating a vehicle under the influence and that the operation led to an injury. Investigations in Conehatta often include police reports, field sobriety tests, chemical test results, and medical evidence documenting injuries. Understanding how these elements interconnect is important for evaluating defenses such as challenging probable cause for the stop, testing procedures, or the causal link between impairment and injury.
Defending a DUI with injury matter means addressing both the alleged impairment and the role of the collision in causing injury. Defense work often involves independent review of crash scene reports, timelines, witness statements, and medical records to assess causation and severity of injuries. In Conehatta, timelines and road conditions may affect causation analysis, and medical testimony can be pivotal. Clients benefit from lawyers who pursue thorough investigative work and expert consultation when necessary while maintaining a clear focus on the practical options available in local court practice.
A DUI with injury charge in Mississippi alleges that an individual operated a motor vehicle while impaired and that the operation caused physical injury to another person. Injury definitions can range from minor cuts and bruises to more significant medical harm requiring treatment. Prosecutors rely on police documentation, medical reports, and testing to establish both impairment and causation. Legal defenses may challenge the reliability of tests, contest the factual sequence of the accident, or dispute whether the driver’s condition was the proximate cause of the reported injuries. Each case requires careful factual and legal analysis.
To secure a conviction for DUI with injury, prosecutors must normally show that the defendant operated the vehicle while under the influence and that this operation caused an injury. The process begins with arrest and booking, followed by arraignment, discovery, pretrial motions, and possibly plea negotiations or trial. Along the way, defense options include challenging the legality of the traffic stop, the administration and accuracy of sobriety tests, and the causal link between impairment and injury. In Conehatta, understanding local discovery norms and court scheduling helps shape an effective defense plan.
Below are common terms you may encounter when facing a DUI with injury charge in Conehatta. Knowing these definitions helps you follow court filings, police reports, and medical records. Terms include elements related to impairment, causation, testing procedures, and legal motions. Familiarity with this vocabulary can make communication with your attorney and the court more productive and reduce confusion during what can be a stressful process. Clear terminology also assists in understanding potential defenses and the types of evidence that matter most in your case.
Probable cause refers to the legal standard officers must meet to lawfully make an arrest or conduct certain searches. In a DUI with injury case, probable cause may be based on observed driving behavior, field sobriety test performance, or visible signs of impairment after a crash. Challenging whether officers had reasonable grounds is often a central defense strategy because evidence obtained after an unlawful stop or arrest may be suppressed. Reviewing dashcam footage, witness statements, and officer reports can reveal whether probable cause truly existed prior to arrest.
Causation addresses whether the defendant’s operation of a vehicle was the direct cause of another person’s injuries. In practice, this can involve medical testimony, accident reconstruction, and timelines showing the sequence of events. Defense counsel may argue that preexisting conditions, intervening actions by others, or unrelated factors contributed to the harm. Establishing or disputing causation can greatly influence a case’s outcome because prosecutors must connect the alleged impairment to the injuries sustained for a conviction on DUI with injury charges.
Chemical test results include breath, blood, or urine analyses used to measure the concentration of alcohol or drugs. The accuracy of these tests depends on proper administration, calibration of instruments, and chain of custody. In Conehatta cases, questions often arise about whether testing followed required procedures, how long after the crash the sample was obtained, and whether medical conditions could have affected results. Defense investigation may involve reviewing laboratory logs, calibration records, and medical reports to identify weaknesses in the testing process.
Mitigation consists of information or actions presented to the court to reduce the severity of consequences such as sentencing or fines. Examples can include taking responsibility for behavior, attending treatment programs, showing a clean driving history, or providing evidence of factors that lessened the offense’s severity. In Conehatta, mitigation can influence plea discussions or sentencing hearings when negotiated resolutions are considered. Preparing a mitigation strategy requires gathering documentation and crafting a narrative that addresses the court’s concerns while protecting the client’s interests.
When facing a DUI with injury charge, individuals can consider a variety of legal approaches ranging from limited consultation to comprehensive representation. A limited approach may involve targeted advice on immediate steps, review of specific evidence, or representation for a single hearing. Full representation involves complete case management, ongoing investigation, negotiation with prosecutors, and courtroom advocacy through trial if needed. Choosing the right approach depends on case complexity, potential penalties, and your goals. In Conehatta, local knowledge often affects which approach is most effective for preserving rights and seeking the best possible resolution.
A limited defense approach may be appropriate when injuries are minor, liability is unclear, or when strong procedural issues exist that could lead to suppression of key evidence. If medical records show minimal harm and police testing procedures were not followed, focused legal work can yield meaningful results without full case retention. Clients in Conehatta with narrow legal questions or a single urgent hearing may benefit from short-term representation that addresses the most pressing legal vulnerabilities while keeping costs more contained than ongoing full-service representation.
Sometimes individuals need immediate, short-term legal guidance to preserve important rights and evidence after an arrest. Examples include ensuring proper requests for discovery, filing timely motions, or taking steps to protect driving privileges. In these scenarios, an initial consultation or limited representation can secure critical protections while clients evaluate longer-term options. In Conehatta, quick action may affect available defenses and the ability to gather independent evidence, so short-term legal help focused on initial preservation steps can be a sensible first measure.
Comprehensive representation becomes important when evidence is complex or injuries are serious, as these factors raise the stakes and often require extensive investigation. Full representation allows for detailed review of crash scene analysis, medical records, and laboratory testing. It also enables engagement of independent experts when appropriate and provides continuity across all stages of the case, from arraignment through potential trial. For residents of Conehatta facing high-stakes allegations, a full-service defense team can manage the many moving parts that influence case outcomes.
When a DUI with injury matter raises both criminal charges and potential civil liability, comprehensive representation helps coordinate defenses across jurisdictions and legal processes. This includes protecting criminal rights while assessing exposure in potential personal injury claims or insurance disputes. A complete defense strategy addresses plea options, trial alternatives, potential post-conviction concerns, and mitigation planning for sentencing or civil negotiations. In Conehatta, where local court timelines and insurance practices vary, coordinated legal management can reduce risk and clarify the best path forward.
A comprehensive defense provides continuous case management, detailed investigation, and an ability to respond to new developments. It ensures someone is always monitoring deadlines, reviewing discovery, and advocating at hearings. For those charged in Conehatta, this means a dedicated approach to challenging evidence, negotiating with prosecutors, and preparing for trial when needed. Full representation often leads to better-informed decisions about plea offers, pretrial motions, and strategic choices that consider both criminal consequences and collateral impacts like employment and insurance.
Beyond evidence review, full representation offers access to resources such as accident reconstruction, medical consultation, and thorough background preparation for court appearances. It also facilitates more nuanced mitigation for sentencing or negotiation with victims or insurers. In many cases, a team approach enables parallel workstreams—investigation, motion practice, and client support—so that no avenue of defense is overlooked. For Conehatta residents facing DUI with injury allegations, this breadth of attention can materially affect outcomes in court and in subsequent civil matters.
Thorough investigation uncovers details that can challenge or contextualize prosecution claims, including witness inconsistencies, timing discrepancies, or procedural errors. A comprehensive defense carefully examines police reports, dashcam or surveillance footage, and medical documentation to identify weaknesses in the prosecution’s case. In Conehatta, this level of inquiry can reveal factors such as road conditions, lighting, or the actions of other parties that bear on causation and responsibility. Proper evidence review improves the ability to negotiate favorable resolutions or present effective arguments at trial.
Comprehensive representation coordinates criminal defense with any associated civil or insurance issues, helping protect clients from unanticipated consequences. This strategy involves assessing possible civil exposure early and advising on how criminal decisions may affect civil negotiations. It also prepares clients for potential interviews, depositions, or settlement discussions while preserving criminal defense options. For Conehatta residents, a coordinated approach reduces surprises and supports informed decision-making across all legal fronts related to a DUI with injury charge.
After an arrest, it is important to gather and preserve relevant records such as medical reports, photographs of the scene, insurance information, and witness contact details. Early documentation helps your counsel reconstruct events and assess medical treatment timelines. In Conehatta, timely action can mean the difference between retaining fresh witness recollections and losing critical evidence. Keep copies of any correspondence from police, prosecutors, or insurers, and avoid posting details about the incident on social media, as public statements can be used against you in both criminal and civil proceedings.
Attending required court appearances and complying with bond or release conditions demonstrates responsibility and helps avoid additional charges or revocation of release. Missing court dates can lead to warrants and complicate defense efforts. If travel, health, or work issues arise, communicate these concerns through counsel to request scheduling accommodations. In Conehatta, maintaining punctuality for hearings and following any imposed conditions like restricted driving or monitoring shows the court that you are taking the matter seriously, which can be meaningful during negotiations or sentencing considerations.
Facing a DUI with injury charge can carry serious criminal penalties and collateral consequences affecting employment, insurance, and personal relationships. Legal representation helps navigate procedural complexity, gathers necessary evidence, and protects your constitutional rights from the earliest stages. In Conehatta and Newton County courtrooms, knowledgeable counsel can challenge the state’s case where warranted, negotiate for reduced charges or alternative resolutions, and present mitigation that may lessen consequences. Getting timely legal advice helps you make informed decisions that align with both short-term goals and long-term needs.
Another reason to retain counsel is the combined potential for criminal and civil exposure. A DUI with injury allegation may prompt separate personal injury claims from those injured in the collision, creating overlapping legal considerations. Representation helps coordinate defense strategy with potential civil negotiations, preserving options and reducing surprises. For Conehatta residents, this coordination is important in protecting rights at criminal hearings while also preparing for possible insurer actions or private claims that could arise after the collision.
Typical circumstances include nighttime collisions where impairment is suspected, multi-vehicle accidents, or incidents involving pedestrians or bicyclists. Factors such as roadway conditions, visibility, and driver behavior are often examined during investigations. Emergency medical response and subsequent hospital treatment create documentation that prosecutors may rely upon. In Conehatta, local factors such as traffic patterns and rural roadways can influence accident dynamics. When injuries are reported, law enforcement tends to conduct thorough inquiries, and individuals in these situations should consider early legal consultation to understand options.
Collisions that occur at night or in poor visibility frequently result in increased scrutiny by law enforcement due to higher risk of impairment-related incidents. Limited lighting, narrow roads, and obstacles can complicate fault determination. Investigators rely on witness accounts and physical evidence to reconstruct what occurred. For drivers in Conehatta, documenting environmental conditions and securing witness information early is important. An attorney can help collect relevant data and challenge assumptions about visibility or causation that may unfairly attribute fault to a defendant.
When an accident involves pedestrians, bicyclists, or motorcyclists, the potential for injury is higher and charges may be pursued more vigorously. Medical reports and testimony about the severity of injuries play a central role in these cases. Defense work in such incidents focuses on causation, actions of all parties, and whether impairment was the proximate cause of harm. In Conehatta, gathering thorough witness statements and medical documentation can be critical to evaluate the strength of the prosecution’s position and identify possible defenses or mitigating circumstances.
Multi-vehicle collisions introduce complexity because multiple drivers and vehicles may have contributed to the incident, and assigning responsibility requires careful analysis. Accident reconstruction and traffic pattern study can clarify how events unfolded and whether the alleged impairment was the primary factor causing injury. In Conehatta, local road design and traffic behavior may affect collision dynamics. Defense strategies often include reviewing crash scene photos, damage patterns, and timelines to assess whether the state’s causation theory accurately reflects what occurred.
Housley Law concentrates on criminal defense and DUI matters for clients in Newton County and the surrounding area. Our approach emphasizes careful review of investigative materials, timely motions to protect rights, and direct communication about realistic case goals. We aim to provide practical guidance tailored to each client’s situation and work to reduce uncertainty by explaining likely paths forward at each stage. For Conehatta residents facing serious allegations, having counsel that understands local court practices can influence the course of hearings and negotiations.
We prioritize early evidence preservation and methodical investigation to identify weaknesses in the prosecution’s case and opportunities for mitigation. Our representation includes preparing for hearings, filing appropriate motions, and presenting factual context that may lessen legal consequences. Clients receive clear explanations of options such as plea alternatives, diversion possibilities where applicable, and the potential outcomes of trial. In Conehatta, informed decision-making supported by prompt legal action often yields better-managed case progress and improved prospects for resolution.
Communication and client support are central to our service. We keep clients informed about court dates, discovery developments, and negotiation status while advising on how criminal choices may affect civil exposure. Our goal is to help individuals make sound legal decisions in stressful circumstances and to pursue outcomes that reflect their priorities. If you are in Conehatta and facing DUI with injury allegations, scheduling a prompt consultation can clarify options and set a plan in motion to protect your rights and prepare a defense strategy.
Our process begins with a thorough case review that includes police reports, medical records, and any available footage or witness statements. From there, we prioritize preserving evidence, requesting discovery, and identifying immediate motion needs to protect rights. We then develop a strategy that may include negotiating with prosecutors, seeking diversionary options if appropriate, or preparing for trial. At each stage we explain likely outcomes and advise on tactical choices. For Conehatta clients, consistent communication and proactive management of deadlines are essential components of our approach.
The initial phase focuses on reviewing arrest records, medical documentation, and witness reports to understand the prosecution’s case and immediate vulnerabilities. Preserving evidence includes requesting discovery, copying medical records, and securing scene photos or surveillance footage before it is lost. We also evaluate whether procedural issues, such as the legality of the stop or testing protocol, might provide grounds for motions. In Conehatta, prompt action ensures that perishable evidence and fresh witness statements are gathered to support defense planning.
A careful review of police and medical reports reveals how authorities documented the crash and injuries, what tests were administered, and the timeline of events. We analyze inconsistencies, omissions, or potential errors that could affect the prosecution’s narrative. Medical entries often play a significant role in establishing injury severity and timing, so we ensure records are complete and evaluated for relevance. In Conehatta, locating and reviewing these materials early allows us to identify defensive angles and prepare necessary follow-up inquiries or expert consultation.
Perishable evidence such as surveillance footage, dashcam recordings, and raw data from breath or blood testing equipment can disappear quickly, so securing it is a priority. We take steps to request evidence formally from police and other custodians, issue subpoenas when appropriate, and communicate with hospitals or insurers to secure medical documentation. Prompt evidence preservation ensures that items critical to establishing timelines and conditions remain available for analysis, which is especially important in Conehatta where smaller jurisdictions may have different retention practices.
After initial preservation, we pursue discovery from the prosecution and file motions where appropriate to challenge illegal stops, testing procedures, or other evidentiary issues. This phase involves in-depth investigation, interviewing witnesses, and consulting technical resources such as accident reconstruction or toxicology review when necessary. By carefully analyzing discovery materials and asserting legal protections through motions, we aim to narrow the evidence the prosecution can rely upon or shape a more favorable case posture for negotiation or trial in Conehatta.
Motions can seek suppression of improperly obtained evidence, clarification of chain of custody for chemical tests, or dismissal of charges when legal standards are not met. These filings require a factual foundation and legal research tailored to the specific circumstances of your case. In Conehatta, understanding local court rules and timing is important for effectively presenting these motions. Successful pretrial motion practice can change the course of a case by limiting what the prosecution may present or by forcing them to reevaluate the strength of their position.
Independent investigation may include locating additional witnesses, commissioning accident reconstruction, or obtaining independent toxicology analysis when appropriate. While not every case requires outside resources, more serious allegations often benefit from technical review to challenge causation or testing conclusions. Coordination of investigative work helps build a comprehensive defense and informs strategic decisions about plea negotiations or trial readiness. For Conehatta residents, this level of inquiry can demonstrate that the defense is prepared and thorough in addressing the prosecution’s claims.
The final phase addresses resolution strategies including plea negotiation, diversion programs when available, or preparing a trial-ready defense. If a plea is negotiated, we work to minimize penalties and address collateral concerns like license impacts and insurance consequences. If trial is necessary, we prepare witnesses, exhibits, and legal arguments to present your case effectively. In sentencing or post-conviction contexts, we pursue mitigation and documentation to seek the most favorable outcome possible given the facts and your goals as someone charged in Conehatta.
Negotiation may result in reduced charges, alternative sentencing, or agreements that limit collateral impacts. We evaluate plea options in light of likely trial outcomes and advise on the pros and cons of each path. Alternative resolutions can include probation, treatment programs, or restitution arrangements, depending on case facts and court receptiveness. For clients in Conehatta, careful negotiation aims to balance resolving the criminal case while protecting future employment and personal interests to the greatest extent possible.
If a trial is necessary, preparation includes developing a clear theory of defense, preparing witness testimony, and organizing documentary and technical evidence for presentation to the jury or judge. This stage requires attention to detail and rehearsal of courtroom procedures. We ensure clients understand the process and their role at trial while presenting a focused and persuasive case. In Conehatta courthouses, familiarity with local practice informs how best to present evidence and cross-examine prosecution witnesses to protect client rights and seek the most favorable verdict possible.
After a DUI with injury arrest in Conehatta, you will typically be processed by law enforcement, receive charges, and be given instructions about court appearances. The next steps often include an arraignment where charges are formally read and bail or release conditions are set, followed by discovery and potential pretrial hearings. It is important to meet required court dates and promptly share all records and information with your attorney so they can begin preserving evidence, requesting discovery, and evaluating the state’s case. During the initial period, gathering medical records, insurance information, and witness contacts is critical to building your defense. Your attorney can advise on steps to avoid inadvertently harming your case, such as limiting public statements and coordinating communications with investigators or insurers. Early legal involvement helps ensure perishable evidence is secured and legal protections are asserted promptly in Conehatta and Newton County courts.
Chemical test results can sometimes be challenged based on how and when tests were administered, equipment calibration, chain of custody, or medical factors that affect accuracy. Reviewing laboratory logs, calibration records, and the procedures followed by officers can reveal weaknesses in test reliability. In Conehatta cases, timely requests for testing documentation and laboratory reports are essential to determining whether a challenge is viable and whether suppression or explanation of results might be appropriate. Challenging test results often requires technical review and may benefit from consultation with qualified analysts who can interpret testing methods and potential errors. Your attorney will evaluate whether procedural defects or medical explanations exist that could cast doubt on the prosecution’s reliance on chemical testing and incorporate those findings into a broader defense strategy tailored to the case facts.
Whether a DUI with injury results in jail time depends on the severity of the injuries, criminal history, and local sentencing practices. More serious injuries and prior convictions increase the risk of incarceration, while first-time offenders with mitigating circumstances may receive alternatives such as probation or treatment-focused sentences. Courts in Newton County consider case specifics and the defendant’s background when determining appropriate penalties, so outcomes vary significantly by case. Legal representation helps present mitigation and negotiate on your behalf to seek alternatives when appropriate. Effective defense and proactive mitigation planning—such as participation in treatment programs or demonstrating community ties—can influence prosecutors and judges to consider reduced penalties. Discussing potential scenarios with counsel can clarify realistic expectations and next steps for your situation.
A DUI with injury can lead to license suspension or administrative actions by the state, separate from criminal penalties. The exact impact depends on Mississippi’s administrative procedures and whether chemical testing was involved. License consequences may be immediate in some circumstances and require timely action to protect driving privileges. For Conehatta residents, promptly addressing administrative hearings and compliance requirements can preserve options and reduce disruption to daily life. Your attorney can advise on the interplay between criminal resolution and administrative license matters, including procedures for contesting suspension or seeking restricted driving privileges when available. Coordinating criminal defense with administrative advocacy helps protect both legal rights and practical needs like employment and family responsibilities.
It is generally advisable to limit statements to police without legal counsel present, as on-the-spot comments may later be used in criminal or civil proceedings. While cooperating with lawful requests is important, exercising your right to counsel before providing detailed statements can prevent inadvertent admissions. In Conehatta, polite refusal to answer detailed questions until an attorney is present is a common protective measure that preserves your ability to control information sharing. If you have already spoken with law enforcement, inform your attorney and provide an accurate account of what was said. Counsel can assess whether recorded statements or interview content create vulnerabilities and advise on next steps. Legal guidance helps ensure that future communications are managed strategically to protect your rights and avoid undermining your defense.
Yes, a DUI with injury can lead to civil lawsuits from those injured in the collision seeking compensation for medical bills, lost wages, and pain and suffering. Civil liability is separate from criminal charges and follows different legal standards, meaning you could face civil claims even if criminal charges are reduced or dismissed. Insurance companies also play a role, and prompt notice of a potential claim often triggers insurer involvement and investigation. Coordinating criminal defense with civil risk management is important to protect overall interests. Early legal consultation helps evaluate exposure, advise on communications with insurers, and develop strategies for handling potential civil claims. Having counsel involved early supports consistent positioning across criminal and civil matters and can influence both settlement negotiations and trial posture.
The time it takes to resolve a DUI with injury case in Newton County varies based on case complexity, court schedules, and whether negotiations or trials are necessary. Simple matters may resolve within weeks if plea agreements are reached, but more complex cases involving technical evidence, expert analysis, or contested motions can take several months or longer. Scheduling can also be affected by local court calendars and the availability of experts or witnesses needed for trial preparation. Staying informed and responsive to discovery requests and court dates helps streamline the process. Your attorney can provide a realistic timeline based on the known facts and court tendencies in Conehatta, and will work to move the case forward while protecting rights and ensuring thorough preparation for each stage.
Important evidence often includes police reports, chemical test documentation, medical records showing injury severity, scene photographs, and witness statements. Dashcam or surveillance footage can be especially informative in reconstructing events and demonstrating conditions at the time of the incident. Chain of custody records for blood or breath samples and calibration logs for testing equipment also play a central role in evaluating the reliability of results used by prosecutors. Defense strategies focus on identifying inconsistencies, procedural errors, or alternative explanations for injuries. Gathering independent accounts and technical evidence early strengthens the ability to challenge prosecution claims. In Conehatta, preserving perishable evidence and promptly requesting discovery are critical to maintaining access to the materials that matter most to case outcomes.
Certain medical conditions and medications can affect the results of chemical tests or mimic signs of impairment observed during roadside evaluations. Conditions such as metabolic issues, recent medical treatment, or the presence of legally prescribed medications may influence breath or blood readings or performance on field sobriety tests. Documenting medical history and obtaining relevant medical records helps determine whether non-alcohol-related factors could explain observed symptoms or test abnormalities. A thorough defense reviews medical documentation and consults qualified reviewers when necessary to assess whether medical factors played a role. In Conehatta cases, understanding the medical context can be essential to challenging the prosecution’s interpretation of test results or observed behavior and may inform strategic decisions about motions or mitigation.
To prepare for your first meeting with counsel, gather all documents related to the arrest and collision, including police reports, medical records, insurance information, photographs, and any correspondence from law enforcement or prosecutors. Make a clear timeline of events and a list of potential witnesses with contact information. Being organized and forthcoming about details helps your attorney evaluate the case quickly and identify immediate preservation steps needed in Conehatta or Newton County courts. Be prepared to discuss personal background information that may matter for mitigation, such as employment, family responsibilities, and any substance use history or treatment efforts. Honest communication with your attorney enables them to craft a realistic defense plan, advise on immediate actions to protect rights, and set expectations about potential outcomes and next steps.
"*" indicates required fields