A revocation hearing in Mikoma is the court proceeding where allegations of probation noncompliance are presented and evaluated. The probation officer or prosecutor typically outlines the claimed violation, and the accused person can respond by presenting evidence, witnesses, or legal arguments. The judge assesses whether a violation occurred by a preponderance of the evidence and then determines appropriate sanctions or remedial measures. Because this process differs from a criminal trial, the focus is on whether terms were breached and what steps best address the situation going forward. Preparation is essential to present mitigating evidence such as treatment records, proof of employment, or documentation showing that missed actions were inadvertent and corrected promptly. Challenging the reliability of testing procedures, the chain of custody for evidence, or procedural errors by probation staff can also affect outcomes. Presenting a clear plan for remediation often persuades judges to prefer alternatives like increased supervision or treatment over incarceration, particularly when the defendant demonstrates accountability and progress.